As web-based media sites publish a woman's allegations of sexual harassment against CJI Ranjan Gogoi, the Supreme Court Secretariat denies all charges and Justice Gogoi recuses himself from passing orders. He says it is a larger conspiracy to destabilize the judiciary

News Snippets

  • Modi says the SP-BSP friendship is "farzi" and will end on may 23
  • Mamata Banerjee says Modi is suffering from haratanka, the phobia of losing and that is why he has turned pale
  • Modi says that Mamata Banerjee wants to impose her Tolabaji (extortion) Tax all over India
  • Hardik Patel slapped by a man at a rally as revenge for his wife's miscarriage in a car during Patel's road blockades in the 2015 quot stir
  • BCCI ombudsman fines Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul Rs 20 lakhs each for misogynistic comments on the chat show Koffee With Karan
  • Buzz around BJP fielding Sunny Deol from Amritsar as Amit Shah meets the actor
  • EC bans web series on Modi and asks the channel to take down all content
  • #MeToo reaches Supreme Court. Former junior research assistant levels sexual harassment charges against CJI Ranjan Gogoi
  • In West Bengal, official in charge of EVMs goes missing but EC says it is for personal reasons
  • Mulayam and Mayawati share the stage at Mainpuri to bury 24-year old enmity
  • After nation-wide outrage, Pragya apologizes and says Karkare was a martyr who was killed by enemy bullets
  • BJP says Pragya's statement are her personal views
  • Pragya Thakur, Malegaon blasts accused and BJP candidate from Bhopal, says police officer Hemant Karkare of anti-terror squad, tortured her in jail and was killed in the 26/11 operations due to her "curse"
  • PM Modi defends choice of Pragya Thakur as BJP's contestant from Bhopal
  • India suspends trade across the Line of Control with Pakistan
rammandir-babri
Ayodhya: SC Exploring Mediation Before Final Hearing

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

The Supreme Court has ordered mediation in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi dispute, despite knowing that there have been numerous efforts at mediation in the past and all of them had failed. How then does it think that the panel now appointed by it will succeed, especially when one of the members of the panel has a record of making statements that can be construed as being biased towards the Hindus? The saving grace is that the court has allowed only eight weeks for the process, keeping in view that almost the same time will be needed to prepare for the final hearing in the case and then the final order. Also, it is better for social harmony to explore all options before doing what needs to be done as per law.

The court must decide on the title suits under consideration. There is no other visible way of resolving the dispute. Obviously, if mediation is successful then all parties will be happy as a court order generally aggrieves one or more parties to a suit. But if after eight weeks there are no signs of an out of court settlement through mediation, the court will have to pronounce its verdict on the title suits. The court had, in a landmark judgment in 1994, refused to be drawn into the faith-based question of whether a Ram Temple existed at the disputed site and was demolished to build the Babri Masjid. Hence, following the due process of law, the decision on the title suits should once and for all resolve the dispute.

Although all parties to the dispute have time and again said that they will abide by the order of the court, it is doubtful whether those bent on building the temple at the exact spot will be pacified if the order goes against them. “Mandir wahin banayenge” has now become more than a matter of faith – it has become a war cry to show the Muslims who is the boss. The Allahabad High Court had suggested a three-way split of the land in Ayodhya between Ram Lalla, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Sunni Wakf Board. That verdict is still under appeal. For peace and harmony to prevail, there must both be a grand Ram Mandir and a restored Babri Masjid at the site. But it can only be possible if the Supreme Court finds that the title in the land vests with all three parties and divides the disputed land accordingly and more importantly, the government is fair to both the communities.

pic credit: lawcorner.in

In Depth

holymenandthecurse

Pragya Thakur, Sakshi Maharaj And The Power Of The Curse

Editor's Pick

chowkidar stay alert

Yes, I Would Like My Children To Be Chowkidars

Election Special - National

EC acts

EC Acts To Ban Yogi, Mayawati, Maneka and Azam Khan From Campaigning

Election Special - States

evms and naidu

Who Is Defeating Chandrababu Naidu – Jagan Reddy Or EVMs?

mobiles