In the worst-ever terror strike in J&K, suicide bomber rams CRPF convoy at Lethpora in Pulwama district, killing more than 40 security personnel

News Snippets

  • Gully Boy opens to rave reviews and good collections on Valentine's Day
  • Suicide bomber in J&K terror strike identified as Adil Ahmed Dar, a local Class XI dropout who joined Jaish a year ago
  • Referring to the terror strike in J&K, PM Modi says that the sacrifice of the security personnel will not go in vain
  • Opposition parties to meet in 2 weeks to review draft common minimum programme (CMP)
  • Arvind Kejriwal says Congress has all but refused to ally with AAP
  • Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal says SC order on Delhi a blow to democracy
  • SC bench divided on who will control services in Delhi, refers the issue to a larger bench
  • CBDT chairman Sushil Chandra appointed as Election Commissioner
  • Setback to Kejriwal: Supreme Court decides that Anti-Corruption Bureau will stay under the Centre and also gives it the power to set up Inquiry Commissions, two key issues that led to a stand-off between the L-G and the Delhi CM
  • CJI orders inquiry into the issue of tampering with orders on the court's website
  • Anil Ambani admits in court that the deal to sell R-Com's assets to Jio has failed
  • Cable switchover deadline extended to March 31
  • Rahul says Modi committed treason in the Rafale deal and can be jailed for it
  • Fire at Hotel Arpit Palace in Delhi kills 17
  • SC hold ex-interim director of CBI, M Nageshwar Rao gulity of contempt and punishes him by making him sit in the corner of the courtroom till the court rose for the day
Cbi_logo
CBI Must Be Made Independent And Strong

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

The Supreme Court has maintained consistency in reinstating the CBI director Alok Verma by quashing the government order that divested him of his powers and sent him on long leave. It has gone by the principles laid down in the Vineet Narain case as far back as 1977 that protected the director of the agency from extraneous interference.

The only new thing, in this case, was the government claim that it had not transferred Verma but had only sent him on leave on the recommendation of the CVC. But the court was not impressed with this argument. It said that anything which divested the director of his powers amounted to “transfer” and it could only be done by the same selection committee (comprising the Prime Minister, the Chief Justice of India and the Leader of the Opposition) that appoints him. The court has reinstated the director with limited powers and has tasked the selection committee to meet within a week and decide about the powers and authority of the director.

The case has thrown up many issues that have a direct bearing on the working of the CBI. If the ‘caged parrot’ is to be uncaged and resume its position as an unbiased and premier investigative agency in the country, it has to be decided how it can be insulated against outside interference. The Supreme Court ruling that the terms of appointment of the director, including divesting him of any powers, can only be done by the committee has strengthened the agency’s independence. But the power of the CVC over the agency also needs to be reexamined.

The court has once again reiterated that “all authorities” must desist from “intermingling and interfering in the functioning of the CBI director”. This clearly means that the court wants the director to work independently. But what should be done in the case when charges of corruption are leveled against the director? Should the CVC take it up and recommend divesting him of his powers, as it did in case of Verma, or should the committee take it up and decide. These questions remain unanswered and must be addressed by the committee when it meets to examine the powers and authority of the director.

It doesn’t need reiterating that an independent CBI is an absolute necessity to keep investigations into political and economic offences unbiased and free from influence from people in high places. All political parties must unite in the interests of the nation to think of a definite law that can help in achieving this. This law must spell out how the director will be appointed, what his powers and authority will be and which body will have the authority of keeping a watch on the functioning of the agency. After the Supreme Court order, this the best time to do so.

In Depth

delhi-opposition-rally

Opposition Parties: Will They Get Their Act Together?

Editor's Pick

rao

M Nageswar Rao Guilty of Contempt: Supreme Court Rightly Sets An Example

mobiles