oppn parties Centre Acted Against Its Own Advisory In Allowing The Release Of Bilkis Bano Case Convicts

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Centre Acted Against Its Own Advisory In Allowing The Release Of Bilkis Bano Case Convicts

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-10-19 06:49:29

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

When the Centre had issued an advisory to the states for release of convicts on compassionate grounds which met legal approval on the occasion of India completing 75 years of Independence, it had expressly prohibited releasing those convicted of terror, murder, rape and other crimes against women. Yet, the Gujarat government, on the recommendation of a controversial panel, had released 11 men convicted of the most ghastly crime of gangraping Bilkis Bano and murdering 14 members of her family including her 3-year old daughter. The incident was a prime example of a "rarest of rare crime" committed in cold blood. The convicts were lucky to escape death punishment for gangrape and mass murder. Their release had kicked up a huge row and the entire blame was put on the Jail Advisory Committee and the Gujarat government.

But now, the state government has informed the Supreme Court that the Centre had given its nod for the release of the said convicts. This is absolutely shocking. How could the Centre go against its own advisory, that too in such a high profile case, and allow the release of those convicted for such a ghastly crime? Did it, and the Gujarat government, not realize that in doing so they were sending out the worst signals?

The Bilkis Bano case had a bumpy ride and the victim got justice only after the Supreme Court intervened and transferred the case out of Gujarat (to Maharashtra). It required a lot of courage on part of those who deposed in court to bring justice to the victim. Now if the convicts are let off after 14 years, ostensibly for 'good' conduct in jail, it is a travesty of justice. The law definitely allows remission of sentences on compassionate grounds but it needs to be changed to make exceptions in cases like the one in question. Those in power must apply their minds with utmost appropriateness in such matters as the discretion allowed to them is not to be used in such casual and cavalier manner.