oppn parties Centre Acted Against Its Own Advisory In Allowing The Release Of Bilkis Bano Case Convicts

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Centre Acted Against Its Own Advisory In Allowing The Release Of Bilkis Bano Case Convicts

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-10-19 06:49:29

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

When the Centre had issued an advisory to the states for release of convicts on compassionate grounds which met legal approval on the occasion of India completing 75 years of Independence, it had expressly prohibited releasing those convicted of terror, murder, rape and other crimes against women. Yet, the Gujarat government, on the recommendation of a controversial panel, had released 11 men convicted of the most ghastly crime of gangraping Bilkis Bano and murdering 14 members of her family including her 3-year old daughter. The incident was a prime example of a "rarest of rare crime" committed in cold blood. The convicts were lucky to escape death punishment for gangrape and mass murder. Their release had kicked up a huge row and the entire blame was put on the Jail Advisory Committee and the Gujarat government.

But now, the state government has informed the Supreme Court that the Centre had given its nod for the release of the said convicts. This is absolutely shocking. How could the Centre go against its own advisory, that too in such a high profile case, and allow the release of those convicted for such a ghastly crime? Did it, and the Gujarat government, not realize that in doing so they were sending out the worst signals?

The Bilkis Bano case had a bumpy ride and the victim got justice only after the Supreme Court intervened and transferred the case out of Gujarat (to Maharashtra). It required a lot of courage on part of those who deposed in court to bring justice to the victim. Now if the convicts are let off after 14 years, ostensibly for 'good' conduct in jail, it is a travesty of justice. The law definitely allows remission of sentences on compassionate grounds but it needs to be changed to make exceptions in cases like the one in question. Those in power must apply their minds with utmost appropriateness in such matters as the discretion allowed to them is not to be used in such casual and cavalier manner.