oppn parties Lack Of 'Conclusive Evidence' Ends Kolhi's First Innings Effort

News Snippets

  • Allahabad HC said that the UP Police is acting as law unto themselves as they detained a person unlawfully even before his arrest
  • Kolkata witnesses traffic snarls on the first day of the Durga Puja festival as revellers start pnadal-hopping
  • Neha Bora was subsequently released and Dipke is to appear before a magistrate today at noon
  • Delhi Police detained Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke, Neha Bora of AISA, student leaders and supporters ahead of a rally in Connaught Place demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's resignation. The protest followed the detention and jailing of two CJP leaders earlier in the week over demonstrations at Jantar Mantar
  • The Reserve Bank of India is considering further monetary tightening to counter capital outflows and increase the cost of betting against the rupee, according to bankers and analysts cited by Reuters. The measures follow recent rate increases and steps to drain liquidity as pressure on the currency and inflation concerns persist
  • India directed oil marketing companies to stop diverting sugar-based feedstocks for ethanol production in the 2026–27 supply year, according to a new tender issued on Friday. The companies have invited bids for 11 billion litres of ethanol made from alternatives including corn and broken rice, amid concerns about domestic sugar supplies and prices
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said India's trade imbalance with China was growing sharply and attributed the problem partly to restrictions on Indian goods and services entering the Chinese market. China subsequently said it was ready to work with India to address mutual economic and trade concerns; India's trade deficit with China reached $69 billion in the first half of FY2026–27, up 27% year-on-year
  • Indian equity benchmarks extended their recovery on Friday, with the Sensex rising 413.66 points to close at 74,729.27 and the Nifty 50 gaining 148.80 points to settle at 23,146.15. Information technology shares, including Tech Mahindra, Infosys and TCS, helped lift the indices
  • India defeated Zimbabwe by four wickets in the opening women's T20 International in Raipur, taking a 1–0 lead in the three-match series. Deepti Sharma and Niki Prasad combined in an 82-run stand after India's top order collapsed, helping the hosts chase down Zimbabwe's total of 114 for five
  • Indian wrestler Komal won bronze in the women's 59 kg category at the Under-23 World Wrestling Championships in Las Vegas, defeating Kazakhstan's Viktoriia Khusainova 7–2. Fellow Indian Amruta Pujari advanced to the women's 72 kg final after recording two pinfall victories
  • Indian shuttler Jagsher Singh Khangurra secured a bronze medal at the BWF World Junior Badminton Championships in Cairo
  • The Supreme Court of India upheld the Bombay High Court's decision quashing the 2020 write-off of ₹8,415 crore in additional tier-1 bonds issued by Yes Bank (Yes Bank). The court ruled that the bank's administrator lacked the authority to extinguish the bonds under the final reconstruction scheme, strengthening bondholders' claims
  • The Supreme Court issued notices to the Election Commission of India, Delhi Police and opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi and Akhilesh Yadav, in separate petitions concerning electoral-roll revision and protests held in Delhi on October 10–12. The court also directed the preservation of CCTV footage linked to allegations of police excesses
  • The Supreme Court ruled that a person converting from Hinduism to Islam cannot automatically claim backward-class reservation benefits in the new religious community solely on the basis of their previous caste status. The judgment upheld the Madras High Court's decision striking down a 2024 Tamil Nadu government order that permitted such certification for specified communities
  • The Election Commission of India ordered a Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls in 14 states and three Union Territories, using January 1, 2027, as the qualifying date for voter eligibility. The draft rolls are scheduled for publication on November 12, claims and objections will be accepted until December 11, and the final rolls are due on January 4, 2027
Delhi HC refuses to ban CJP's Tiranga rally at Central Park in Connaught Place today /////// Police says will control and regulate it /////// NDMC closes the park for the public on Friday and Saturday
oppn parties
Lack Of 'Conclusive Evidence' Ends Kolhi's First Innings Effort

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-12-03 13:59:07

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Captain Virat Kohli, returning after a short break, lasted just 4 balls in the first innings of the second Test between India and New Zealand at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai. He was given out leg before to spinner Ajaz Patel for a duck. One uses the term 'given out' as a huge controversy has erupted over the dismissal.

On being given out by the on-field umpire, Kohli sought a review of the decision. The third umpire was not sure. Numerous replays showed the ball spank in the middle of the bat and pad and the sound was also there. But the adjudicator could not, as also the millions of viewers including experts and commentators could not, exactly point out or come to a conclusive view that what the ball hit first - the pad or the bat. In the end, the third umpire said that in the absence of conclusive evidence, he was constrained to let the on-field umpire's decision stand.

Since cricket is a game and not a debatable point of law in a court, the rule that a person is not guilty until proven could not be applied here. Yet the moot point is, in cases like this, who should get the benefit of the doubt, the batter or the bowler?

If the conclusive evidence about what the ball hit first could not be discerned from the replays, why should the third umpire let the on-field umpire's decision stand? The review is taken precisely for the reason that the contesting party feels that the on-field umpire had erred. If the third umpire, even with the aid of technology, could not decide clearly, the question is how could the on-field umpire decide the matter in an instant by just seeing the ball hit the region where both bat and pad were vying to touch it and on hearing a sound? How could he decide that the ball hit the pad first? And if he was unsure like the third umpire, why did he not give the benefit of the doubt to the batter?

However, these are academic questions as the umpiring decision has to be respected. But the incident does raise a few questions about DRS, its efficacy and the need to fine tune the technology further. It is very disappointing for contesting party to learn that their review failed due to inconclusive evidence. They, then, might be left wondering why the benefit of the doubt did not go in their favour.

picture courtesy: screengrab from a video uploaded by the BCCI

watch the full video here to decide for yourself