oppn parties PF Rule Change Is Not Unfair, It Was Being Misused By HNIs

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
PF Rule Change Is Not Unfair, It Was Being Misused By HNIs

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2021-02-05 08:26:46

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

Provident funds investments (subject to a limit) and interests earned on them were treated under the exempt, exempt, exempt regime for taxation purposes till a few years ago. But widespread misuse by some HNIs, who used to invest much more than was statutorily required to earn a higher rate of interest (as compared to most other investment instruments and also escape tax on interest earned) has made the finance ministry focus on streamlining the provisions in order that there is no revenue loss to the government.

Last year, the finance minister had changed the rules to put a cap of Rs 7.5 lakh on contributions to PF, superannuation schemes or NPS and any contribution above that cap was made taxable as a perquisite in the hands of the employee. This year, the Budget has made interest earned (on accrual basis) on PF taxable if the annual contribution is above Rs 2.5 lakh. There was widespread criticism of the move as many experts felt that it will make PF investment unattractive for many.

The government has now come out with figures which show that top 20 HNIs have Rs 825 crore in their PF accounts. It also said that 1.2 lakh account holders, just 0.3 percent of the total 4.5 crore, were investing huge sums in their PF accounts. Since PF offers a higher rate of interest and the account cannot be attached under any legal proceedings, they feel that it is a safe route to invest money. But the government loses revenue as the interest is totally exempt from tax.

One feels that the average salary earner is not going to be put at a disadvantage by this change. It is only those that earn huge salaries and take advantage of the PF account to earn a higher rate of tax exempt interest that will be affected. But they should at any rate be paying tax on the interest earned. Hence, this is a good move by the finance minister and it will bring in additional revenue from HNIs without impacting the common man.