oppn parties SC Clears The Confusion Over Section 6 Of The Hindu Succession Act

News Snippets

  • For the first time ever, Mukesh Ambani buys a 29% stake in Gautam Adani's Mahan Energen, a subsidiary of Adani Power to source 500MW of electricity from the company's power plant in MP
  • Stocks continue to rise on Thursday - Sensex gains 639 points to 73635 and Nifty 203 points to 22326
  • Golf - Indian Open: 3 Indians at tied 14th as Joost Luiten takes the lead with a wonderful 7-under 65
  • IPL: RR beat DC by 12 runs as Riyan Parag (84 off just 45 balls) shines
  • SP drops two candidates owing allegiance to Azam Khan from Rampur and Moradabad
  • In Assam, a controversy erupted after a picture of UPPL leader Benjamin Basumatary, lying on a stack of Rs 500 notes circulated on social media. UPPL is an ally of the BJP
  • AAP's Jalandhar-West MP Sushil Kumar Rinku joins the BJP. He was the only AAP Lok Sabha MP
  • Supreme Court dismisses Centre's plea to review its 2023 verdict in the PMLA case
  • Close save for passengers as they remain unhurt after the wings of two planes graze at Kolkata airport. Pilots derostered and inquiry ordered by DGCA
  • Bengal BJP leader Dilip Ghosh gets notice from the EC as well as the BJP for making ugly remarks about Mamata Banerjee's parentage
  • Sadanand Vasanth Date, who faught terrorists in the 26/11 attack and was awarded the Preisent's Police medal, has been appointed the head of the NIA
  • Centre will borrow Rs 7.5L cr in the first six months of FY25, nearly 50% of the target for the full year
  • 25 stocks, including SBI, will see same day trade settlements from today in the world's fastest settlement mode in both BSE and NSE
  • Stocks recover smartly on Wednesday: Sensex rises 526 points to 72996 and Nifty 118 points to 22123
  • Tennis: Rohan Bopanna-Matthew Ebden reached the semifinals of the Miami Open
Delhi Lt Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena says government cannot be run from jail, hints at President's Rule in the capital ////// In a dangerous incident, the wings of two planes grazed while taxiing on the runway at Kolkata airport, all passengers were safe but DGCA ordered an inquiry and the pilots were derostered
oppn parties
SC Clears The Confusion Over Section 6 Of The Hindu Succession Act

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-08-12 12:22:08

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The Supreme Court has put to rest all the confusion arising out of different interpretations of the amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act (HSA) giving equal rights to daughters in the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) property. The court has said that daughters will have equal share in such property right from 1956 (when the HAS was codified) as per the amended section 6 which came into force on September 9, 2005. That amendment had made daughters coparceners in the HUF, thereby giving them the same rights hitherto enjoyed by the sons of the family.

Categorically stating that the amended section will operate with retrospective effect, the court said that all daughters born before September 2005 will have equal share in the HUF property irrespective of whether the father was alive or not. The cut-off date of September 9, 2005 will apply only for deciding the property that belonged to the HUF on that date.

What this means is that daughters cannot claim inheritance rights or raise any dispute over HUF property that was disposed of by whatever means prior to that date. The property could have been sold off, partitioned, given away to charity, gifted to anyone, let out of the possession of the HUF by any other legal means for or without any valuable consideration or otherwise legally alienated in a way that excludes it from the ownership of the HUF. In such a scenario, the daughters cannot raise questions about the transaction that took place before September 9, 2005. They will have equal rights only in the property that was held in the name of the HUF on the cut-off date.

This settles a lot of confusion that was prevailing since different benches of the apex court had interpreted the concerned section in different ways. It provides daughters with the legal right (which was the main intention of the legislature) to inherit HUF property equally with other coparceners without any conditions if all conditions are satisfied. At the same time, it does away with the mischief that could have arisen if a vengeful desire or wrong legal advice had made daughters file cases regarding the HUF property that was disposed of before September 9, 2005.