oppn parties SC Clears The Confusion Over Section 6 Of The Hindu Succession Act

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
SC Clears The Confusion Over Section 6 Of The Hindu Succession Act

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-08-12 12:22:08

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The Supreme Court has put to rest all the confusion arising out of different interpretations of the amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act (HSA) giving equal rights to daughters in the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) property. The court has said that daughters will have equal share in such property right from 1956 (when the HAS was codified) as per the amended section 6 which came into force on September 9, 2005. That amendment had made daughters coparceners in the HUF, thereby giving them the same rights hitherto enjoyed by the sons of the family.

Categorically stating that the amended section will operate with retrospective effect, the court said that all daughters born before September 2005 will have equal share in the HUF property irrespective of whether the father was alive or not. The cut-off date of September 9, 2005 will apply only for deciding the property that belonged to the HUF on that date.

What this means is that daughters cannot claim inheritance rights or raise any dispute over HUF property that was disposed of by whatever means prior to that date. The property could have been sold off, partitioned, given away to charity, gifted to anyone, let out of the possession of the HUF by any other legal means for or without any valuable consideration or otherwise legally alienated in a way that excludes it from the ownership of the HUF. In such a scenario, the daughters cannot raise questions about the transaction that took place before September 9, 2005. They will have equal rights only in the property that was held in the name of the HUF on the cut-off date.

This settles a lot of confusion that was prevailing since different benches of the apex court had interpreted the concerned section in different ways. It provides daughters with the legal right (which was the main intention of the legislature) to inherit HUF property equally with other coparceners without any conditions if all conditions are satisfied. At the same time, it does away with the mischief that could have arisen if a vengeful desire or wrong legal advice had made daughters file cases regarding the HUF property that was disposed of before September 9, 2005.