oppn parties Stringent PMLA Provisions Held Valid By Supreme Court

News Snippets

  • Maharashtra cabinet is likely to bee expanded today with the Shiv Sena and the BJP equally sharing the new berths
  • Kapil Sibal says there is 'no hope left' in Supreme Court, slammed by law minister Kiren Rijiju
  • Centre tells Rajya Sabha that Bengal got zero MGNREGS payout this fiscal for not complying with Central directives
  • Monsoon session of Parliament ends 4 days early
  • Chess Olympiad: India A, comprising Tania Sachdev, Koneru Humoy and Bhakti, among others, look set to win gold
  • CWG: India's best ever perrformance with 22 golds, 16 silvers and 23 bronze medals and 4th position on the table
  • CWG: Sharath Kamal wins gold in men's singles in table tennis
  • CWG: Satwik-Chirag win gold in men's doubles in badminton
  • CWG: PV Sindhu wins gold in women's singles in badminton
  • CWG: Lakshya Sen wins gold in men's singles in badminton
  • Mamata Banerjee says states should not be forced to implement the NEP
  • PM Modi asks states to raise farm output
  • Differences between JD(U) and BJP in Bihar came to fore again as JD(U) chief Lalan Singh accused the BJP of repeating the Chirag Paswan model with RCP Singh
  • CWG: Lakhsya Sen and PV Sindhu enter finals in badminton while Sharath Kamal enters TT finals
  • CWG: Indian women lose to Australia by 9 runs in cricket to settle for silver
Nitish Kumar resigns as Bihar chief minister, breaks alliance with the BJP /////// Most likely will form the government in alliance with RJD, Congress and Left parties
oppn parties
Stringent PMLA Provisions Held Valid By Supreme Court

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-07-28 07:40:04

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court has examined the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) and has found them to be within the ambit of the constitution. It has also said that the stringent bail conditions set in PMLA are valid as the defects pointed out by the SC in 2017 had been subsequently cured and are now valid. The bench was also of the view that the special powers granted to the Enforcement Directorate (ED)  were also not in conflict with the constitution as the same powers were there in other laws which have stood the test of time and had not been declared unconstitutional. SC also upheld the provision that statements made before the ED are admissible in a court of law. 

The Supreme Court said that apart from concealment, possession and acquisition of a property linked to the proceeds of crime, even projecting such a property as being 'untainted' was an offence under the PMLA. This means that anyone buying a 'tainted' property, even unknowingly, can be prosecuted under PMLA. The court also upheld the power of the ED to arrest the accused without supplying him with the ECIR (enforcement case information report) and by just informing him or her of the reason for the arrest. It also held as valid ED's power to seize assets under PMLA without the registration of scheduled offence or filing of complaint.

After the Supreme Court order, many PMLA cases that were stuck due to court cases filed by the accused on various points of law (mainly that the provisions of the PMLA were unconstitutional) will now be proceeded with again. Although the opposition has called the SC order "unfortunate" and has said that the 'misuse' of ED will increase, the fact is that the PMLA is an important law that can be very effective in proceeding against corrupt politicians and others who hide their ill-begotten wealth using various means. The Supreme Court, while issuing a 545-page verdict that examined the provisions of PMLA minutely, has said that "money laundering cannot be said to be less heinous than the offence of terrorism" and that "tainted money breeds discontent in any society and in turn leads to more crime and civil unrest, and thus, the onus on the government and the people to identify and seize such money is heavy."