oppn parties Stringent PMLA Provisions Held Valid By Supreme Court

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Stringent PMLA Provisions Held Valid By Supreme Court

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-07-28 07:40:04

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court has examined the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) and has found them to be within the ambit of the constitution. It has also said that the stringent bail conditions set in PMLA are valid as the defects pointed out by the SC in 2017 had been subsequently cured and are now valid. The bench was also of the view that the special powers granted to the Enforcement Directorate (ED)  were also not in conflict with the constitution as the same powers were there in other laws which have stood the test of time and had not been declared unconstitutional. SC also upheld the provision that statements made before the ED are admissible in a court of law. 

The Supreme Court said that apart from concealment, possession and acquisition of a property linked to the proceeds of crime, even projecting such a property as being 'untainted' was an offence under the PMLA. This means that anyone buying a 'tainted' property, even unknowingly, can be prosecuted under PMLA. The court also upheld the power of the ED to arrest the accused without supplying him with the ECIR (enforcement case information report) and by just informing him or her of the reason for the arrest. It also held as valid ED's power to seize assets under PMLA without the registration of scheduled offence or filing of complaint.

After the Supreme Court order, many PMLA cases that were stuck due to court cases filed by the accused on various points of law (mainly that the provisions of the PMLA were unconstitutional) will now be proceeded with again. Although the opposition has called the SC order "unfortunate" and has said that the 'misuse' of ED will increase, the fact is that the PMLA is an important law that can be very effective in proceeding against corrupt politicians and others who hide their ill-begotten wealth using various means. The Supreme Court, while issuing a 545-page verdict that examined the provisions of PMLA minutely, has said that "money laundering cannot be said to be less heinous than the offence of terrorism" and that "tainted money breeds discontent in any society and in turn leads to more crime and civil unrest, and thus, the onus on the government and the people to identify and seize such money is heavy."