By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2026-11-10 06:43:33
The Centre has told the Supreme Court that it is contemplating a committee to review the UGC's 2026 equity regulations. That is not a plan. The Court stayed the regulations on January 29, and more than nine months later the government has not named a member, a mandate or a deadline.
The delay has a cost. The 2012 regulations, largely advisory, are what govern campuses today. The 2026 text promised an Equity Committee meeting within 24 hours of a complaint and a report within 15 working days. Students have none of that now. The data show why they need it. Complaints reported to the UGC rose from 173 in 2019-20 to 378 in 2023-24. Of 122 student suicides in centrally funded institutions between 2014 and 2021, 68 were of SC, ST and OBC students.
The regulations were also flawed, and the Court was right to say so. Regulation 3(1)(c) confines caste-based discrimination to SC, ST and OBC victims, while 3(1)(e) already covers unfair treatment of any stakeholder on grounds including caste. The two clauses must be reconciled in plain language. The final text dropped the 2025 draft's penalty for false complaints. It should return, with a clear line between a false complaint and an unproven one. The ragging and segregation provisions need repair. Equity Committees chaired by institutional heads need independent members and public reporting of anonymised outcomes.
The politics is plain. Uttar Pradesh votes in 2027, and BJP office-bearers resigned in January over the rules. A review that begins in electoral anxiety will end in dilution. The Centre must prove otherwise. Dalit, Adivasi and OBC students have waited long enough for enforceable protection, and they will read any retreat for what it is.
Before the next hearing, the government should publish the committee's composition, its terms of reference and a deadline. It should include jurists, educators and members of the affected communities. It should consult students of every background.
Caste bias does not pause while committees deliberate. The Court has done its part. The rules must now become clearer, not weaker, and the Centre must say when it will act.








