BJP turns up the heat on the Congress government in Madhya Pradesh, asks CM Kamal Nath to prove majority

News Snippets

  • Sensex above 39300 and Nifty crosses 11800 as investors get richer by Rs 5.33 lakhs in a day as punters are buoyed by the exit poll predictions
  • After hectic parleys in Delhi, Chandrababu Naidu visits Kolkata to sound out Mamata Banerjee in case there is a hung parliament
  • Mamata Banerjee says exit polls are "gossip" and the Centre will manipulate EVMs
  • Exit polls predict between 11 and 16 seats for the BJP in West Bengal
  • Congress says exit polls are bunkum, the country is in for a surprise on May 23rd
  • Exit polls predict clear majority for NDA
  • Congress says it will not insist on the PM's post if opposition gets close to the half-way mark
  • Pragya Thakur says Godse was a patriot, retracts after rebuke from party
  • Modi offer to rebuild Vidyasagar statue in Kolkata, Mamata rejects offer, saying BJP alms are not required
  • Delhi HC says #MeToo can't be allowed to become a "sullying you too" campaign.
  • National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) says homebuyers can seek refund if flat is delayed by more than one year
  • AFSPA might be lifted in Assam
  • Two climbers missing and two critical from an expedition tp scale Mount Kanchenjunga
  • Monsoon likely to be delayed by 5 days, to arrive on June 6
  • Supreme Court questions Bengal government over the delay in releasing BJP activist who posted a morphed image of Mamata Banerjee on her FB page
modi_bipoic_630_630_630_630
Ban On Modi Biopic: Miscalculation By Both The BJP And The Producers

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

After three courts, including the country’s apex court, refused to interfere with the release of the Narendra Modi biopic PM Narendra Modi, the Election Commission (repeatedly called a stooge of the ruling party at the Centre by the opposition parties) has finally banned the release of the film, both in cinema theatres and on digital media, till the model code of conduct (MCC) is in force. It has also decreed that the airing of NaMo television channel be similarly stopped till that time.

This comes as a huge blow to both the producers and the BJP. The former were hoping to cash in on the popularity of the Prime Minister to make money during the election time while the party was hoping that the story on celluloid would win new converts and increase its vote share. The producers can at least hope that Modi comes back to power and his popularity increases in which case they can still hope to get excellent returns on their investment. But for the party, the release of the film after the elections will only have academic value apart from adding to the persona of its charismatic leader.

Both the producers and the party must share the blame for bringing things to such a pass. It was obvious that there would be objections from the opposition against any film that eulogizes Modi, that too during election time. It was also obvious that the elections were to be held anytime in April and May. Business sense warranted that the producers should have released the film sometime in January to escape punitive action from the EC. In three months, the film would have spread the message of Modi all across the world and achieved its goal. That they didn’t release it then proves that they did not have good legal advisors.

The BJP should also have anticipated that the opposition would create an issue and the film would not pass muster under the MCC. It would be childish to assume that the party or the Prime Minister was not involved in the making of the film. Any biopic on a living person cannot be made without the express consent of the subject. The party knew that there would be huge and free publicity for Modi and the party through the film. Hence, it should have urged the producers to release it much before the MCC came into force. That it didn’t do so proves that either it was wrongly advised that the film would not violate the MCC or was overconfident that the EC or the courts would not interfere.