oppn parties Amidst Ugly Scenes in the CWC, Congress Postpones Election Of President To June

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Amidst Ugly Scenes in the CWC, Congress Postpones Election Of President To June

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-01-23 12:42:57

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It was no surprise that the latest meeting of the Congress Working Committee (CWC) once again saw dispute over holding of elections for a new chief of the party and also to the seats in the highest decision making body. The two groups are well defined. One group comprises leader like Ashok Gehlot, Amarinder Singh, Bhupesh Baghel, A K Antony, Ambika Soni and Haresh Rawat who are the loyalists (or sycophants, depending on one's view) of the Gandhi family and the other group consists  of the letter writers or what they have come to be called, the Group of 23. It has Ghulam Nabi Azad, Mukul Wasnik, P Chidambaram and Anand Sharma, among others.

The Group of 23 demanded immediate elections for the position of the party chief, some seats on the CWC and the party election committee. This group was of the view that things cannot be delayed indefinitely and elections should be held forthwith. The other group said that since state elections were coming up in four important states and a Union territory, it was not the right time to hold internal elections. The party should focus on the state elections. A bitter exchange of words is reported to have taken place between the two groups with Gehlot and Sharma leading the charge from the respective groups. It is reported that Rahul Gandhi intervened to give the June date and asked partymen to stop fighting and move on.

Both groups are right. While the Group of 23 thinks that the party is not seriously interested in holding elections, it keeps postponing the same. Hence, it demanded immediate action. The other group is also right that the party should focus on the upcoming state elections. The fight once again showed the deep division between the senior Congressmen who have seats in the CWC. That the party has allowed matters to drift and has not taken action on the points raised by the dissidents is typical of it. The Congress abhors change and most Congressmen are comfortable in the status quo. Given a chance, the loyalists will never want the party to hold elections and will be happy with whatever the Gandhis do and work with whoever they nominate to important positions.

But this is no longer accepted to an ever growing number of other seniors. They do not want the party to break, otherwise they would have left to chart their own course. They have the good of the party at heart and want it to deflect the dynastic and non-democratic party barb with which the BJP regularly taunts it. They are saddened that the party is becoming inconsequential mainly due to the top leadership not coming out of its comatose state. They want to revive the party but such is the iron grip of the Gandhis and their loyalists that they cannot do anything. One thinks that if the June deadline for the elections is not met, the Group of 23 will take a decisive action as their patience has been tested many times and this time something is bound to give.