oppn parties Chidambaram Granted Bail: The Supreme Reaffirms That Bail, Not Jail, Is The Rule

News Snippets

  • Centre asks states to give shelter and food to migrant workers to stop them from taking to the streets
  • RBI cuts repo rate by 75 bps, the steepest in 10 years
  • Centre writes to states regarding laxity in monitoring people who had arrived from abroad between January and March
  • Kerala reports a spurt in new cases
  • With 124 fresh cases on Friday, the number of reported cases in India stand at 854
  • Five of a family, including a 9-month-old-baby test positive for Covid-19 in Nadia district in West Bengal on Friday
  • The Pakistani army is reportedly forcibly moving all Covid-19 patients to PoK and Gilgit
  • Untimely azaans in J&K mosques spark panic gathering
  • Stocks rise - Sensex up by 1400 points and Nifty goes above the 8600 mark
  • Rahul Gandhi says the economic package is "the first step in the right direction"
  • The government announces wide-ranging measures to help the poor overcome the economic hardship caused by Covid-19
  • G20 leaders to hold a virtual meeting today to explore ways of fighting Covid-19 in a coordinated manner
  • The Delhi government orders testing of all medical staff after the positive test on a Delhi mohalla clinic doctor
  • As a fallout of a Delhi mohalla clinic doctor testing positive for Covid-19, 900 people in the chain quarantined
  • China offers help to India in the fight against Covid-19 and says India will win the battle at an early date
Government announces Rs 1.72 lakh crore relief package /////// Sonia Gandhi and P Chidambaram laud the government for the lockdown and offer their full support
oppn parties
Chidambaram Granted Bail: The Supreme Reaffirms That Bail, Not Jail, Is The Rule

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2019-12-04 13:17:35

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

The Supreme Court has finally granted bail to former Finance Minister P Chidambaram in the INX Media case. The court was of the view that although economic offences come under the purview of grave crimes since bail, not jail is the rule, it cannot be denied just on the presumption that the alleged wrongdoer, being an influential person, was in a position to influence witnesses and tamper with evidence. The court granted him bail against personal bond and sureties and imposed the usual restrictions.

The bench headed by Justice R Bhanumati took a personal bond of Rs 2 lakhs and two sureties of an equal amount. It also put the usual restrictions on foreign travel for which Chidambaram would have to take the court’s permission. It also warned him not to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. It needs reminding that Chidambaram spent 106 days in jail as the ED argued that he had committed grave offences and misused his office and was likely to tamper with evidence and influence witnesses as he still wielded a lot of influence in the corridors of power given past positions held by him. The Delhi High Court had earlier refused to grant him bail.

In this respect, it needs to be said that the Delhi High Court should have taken the same line as now taken by the apex court. Chidambaram should have been granted bail then. The ED, apart from showing circumstantial evidence and properties that are allegedly held benami by the Chidambaram family, was not able to directly link the wrongdoings to Chidambaram. Hence, it is wrong to hold a person in captivity just on assumption of guilt or on the excuse that he might tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. In any case, if Chidambaram is found to do anything like that, the ED can lodge a complaint, obtain a warrant and arrest him again.