oppn parties Do Opposition Charges Of EVM Replacement Hold Water?

News Snippets

  • India reaches 700000 corona cases and 20000 deaths due to the disease
  • West Bengal plans to create a plasma bank for Covid patients
  • Chargesheet filed against arrested J&K police officer Devinder Singh and others. Singh accused of being a Pakistani informer
  • Very few people visit ASI monuments that were opened on Monday
  • Sensex gains 1500 points in four trading sessions in July
  • The Centre says final year university exams should be held in September and degrees should only be given on the basis of exams
  • Trade surplus for India in June for the first time in 18 years
  • Highway ministry increases the border roads upkeep fund by four times
  • Some scientists claim coronavirus is airborne and ask WHO to revise recommendations
  • PM Modi holds a meeting with President Kovind amid the border dispute between India and China
  • The Taj Mahal will remain closed even as other ASI monuments will reopen from today
  • 36 Vande Bharat flights to be operated between India and the US by Air India
  • Bungalow occupied by Priyanka Gandhi allotted to BJP MP Anil Baluni, the head of the party's media cell
  • Kerala extends coronavirus guidelines for one year
  • Ban on international flights extended till July 31
After four months of standoff, including a bloody clash, India and China agree on pulling back troops at the LAC
oppn parties
Do Opposition Charges Of EVM Replacement Hold Water?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2019-05-22 13:08:02

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
Do the opposition parties really believe that there will be a large scale replacement of EVMs? Do they seriously believe that anyone can do so despite the constant glare the machines are under? The fact is that EVMs have been kept in strong rooms with three layers of security which is extremely difficult to breach. Over and above that, the EC has allowed political parties to have one of their persons to be on constant watch by issuing photo permits for up to three persons for eight-hour shifts. Most political parties have availed of this facility and have deputed their chowkidars.

The few cases of EVM movement and interception, sought to be portrayed as attempts at replacement by the opposition, have proved to be misinformed. In the first case, the EC said that movement of EVMs from one place to another is the standard operating procedure to ensure better protection in a larger strong room. Most opposition parties have ruled in states at one time or another. They must have known this. Yet they chose to create a needless controversy.

In the second case in UP, it was found that the trucks intercepted with EVMs were carrying the spare machines (for the uninitiated, the EC keeps spare machines at several locations to replace those that may malfunction during voting) back to their storage points. None of the machines were sealed, as is done by polling officer in charge of the booth. They were blank machines. The opposition must have known this too. Yet, again, they created a needless controversy. In both the cases, sections of the media added fuel to the fire by filing factually incorrect reports.

The opposition parties and their leaders (most of whom were hoping to play kingmakers and some of whom were even thinking of being king or queen) may not believe the exit polls. They might still believe that the people have voted against Modi. But the fact is that the opposition let Modi hijack the agenda. They let him turn the glare away from the failings of his government. They let him use constricted nationalism to portray himself as the only person who could provide a strong government. They made it easy for the NDA by remaining largely divided. Now, they might call the exit polls “gossip” or “nautanki” or whatever they feel like, but if the results are even close to them, the opposition will rue the fact that they could not knockout Modi despite the perceived anti-incumbency.