oppn parties Don't Differentiate Between 'Crimes'

News Snippets

  • DMK leader RS Bharathi says media is running like the red light area in Mumbai
  • A Delhi court issues fresh warrants for the hanging of the Nirbhaya convicts. Fixes the date for March 3
  • Supreme Court appoints a mediation team to ask Shaheen Bagh protestors to avoid blocking the road and shift to another venue
  • Supreme Court says peaceful protests cannot be denied in a democracy but also says that a balance must be struck as protestors cannot be allowed to block roads
  • Telcos pay part of their dues for AGR after the bashing from the Supreme Court
  • Debbie Abrahams, a Labour MP from UK, who was critical of India's action in Kashmir, not allowed to enter India. She was deported to Dubai from the Delhi airport
  • Sidharth Shukla wins Big Boss 13
  • Gully Boy sweeps most of the awards at the Filmfare Awards
  • Sharad Pawar says Maharashtra CM Uddhav Thackeray wrong in allowing NIA to take over the Elgar Parishad case
  • Supreme Court frames guidelines and sets a six-month time frame for hearing of appeals made by death row convicts
  • EC rebuts the allegations of not acting on hate speech made by ex-CEC SY Quraishi
  • DoT asks telcos to pay up Rs 4L cr by midnight on Friday after the Supreme Court asks it why its order of recovering the dues was not being complied with
  • Gorakhpur doctor Kafeel Khan, under probe for making an inflammatory and anti-CAA speech in AMU, arrested under NSA before he could be released from jail after being granted bail by a court
  • Supreme Court asks the J&K administration to explain and justify Omar Abdullah's detention under the PSA Act
  • In a shameful incident, 68 girls stripped in a Gujarat college to check if they were menstruating
Supreme Court allows permanent commission for women in the armed forces, allows three months for implementation of the order
oppn parties
Don't Differentiate Between 'Crimes'

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-08-28 22:20:45

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
One staunchly believes in rule of law, fair and efficient investigation and prompt and unbiased justice. But when the whole process becomes biased and one-sided, with those ruling the country having their own interpretations for terms like ‘anti-national’, ‘sedition’ and ‘dissent’, the country ceases to have rule of law. Or at least rule of law as it exists in the statute books. Draconian laws are made to suppress dissenting, but often sane, voices just to satisfy the megalomania of the ruling classes. No political party or leader in India today is democratic, civil or magnanimous enough to tolerate people with a view that differs from his or her own. If the view is expressed by a person from within the party, he or she is promptly sidelined or even expelled. If the view is from the citizenry, the person is harassed using multiple tools or arrested under the plethora of laws that are made ostensibly to prevent enmity between communities but are in reality used to silence people from castigating the ruling dispensation of the day.

A letter found in a raid or a name taken by person who has been arrested is enough for the investigating agencies to raid and arrest prominent citizens on the charge of having links with Maoists. The arrest today of Varavara Rao, Arun Fereira, Venon Gonsalves, Sudha Bharadwaj and Gautam Navalakha – all social activists who were working with tribals – presumably for their alleged links with Maoists, as also the arrest of Prof. Shoma Sen and four others in June, is not right and is designed to instill fear in the minds of social activists who work with marginalized people. The government has forgotten these tribals, the corporate class wants to occupy their lands and they lead a subsistence level existence. These activists are all they have to protect them from further suppression. By trying to prevent them and others like them from helping the poor, the government is doing a great disservice to the nation. The whole process was started by the Congress, as historian Ramchandra Guha has rightly pointed out, and this government is proving to be no different – in fact it is taking it to the extreme.

But when this comes under the backdrop of the Kathua rape, the daily lynchings under the guise of protecting the cow and other misdemeanors where people associated with the Hindu right are actively involved but are not arrested or prosecuted, it shows that rule of law is being followed by the government through tinted glasses. If making ‘provocative' speeches at Bhima Koregaon was an offence that could have led to enmity between communities, isn’t killing someone just on the suspicion of possessing beef not more so? Why is the government so concerned about the former but sleeping on the latter? If all these ‘crimes’ are treated with an even hand, fairly investigated and brought to justice, one would have no criticism to offer, for a crime is a crime and deserves the punishment prescribed by law. But when the government stoops to choose and pick between crimes, its motives become suspect and this cannot be tolerated in a democratic country. One doesn’t subscribe to Left or Maoist ideology, but one acknowledges their right to have their own views and propagate them without fear or suppression as long as they do not directly incite mobs to violence.

Picture courtesy: screengrab from Times Now