oppn parties DoT Order Allowing Relief To Telcos: The Supreme Court Is Livid And Rightly So

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
DoT Order Allowing Relief To Telcos: The Supreme Court Is Livid And Rightly So

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-02-15 11:08:02

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court was livid at the way a Department of Telecommunications (DoT) desk officer Mandar Deshpande issued an order, allegedly with approval of PK Sinha, Member (Finance) of DoT, that had the effect of putting a stay on the apex court's earlier order setting a January 25 deadline for telecommunications firms like Airtel and Vodafone-Idea to pay their long-pending licence fee and spectrum usage charges.

On January 23, just two days before the deadline set by the Supreme Court, Deshpande issued an order to the accountant-general asking him neither to insist on payment from telcos nor to take any coercive action if they failed to pay up. Even a layman will make out that how the DoT order superseded the Supreme Court order and how the telcos were provided relief after the government had fought a bitter legal battle lasting several years to recover the dues. The Supreme Court was rightly outraged that this could happen. Justice Arun Mishra, not normally given to show anger, exploded and asked "how can a desk officer do this to the Supreme Court's order? Is there no law left in the country". Justice Mishra also said that he was deeply anguished by the turn of events and wondered how he should work in "in this system and this country".

After the court asked solicitor-general Tushar Mehta if the government had taken any action against Deshpande and threatened to initiate contempt proceedings against all the involved persons, the government moved fast to pacify the court. First, DoT directed all its field offices in the country to issue notices demanding the dues forthwith. Hence, the UP (West) telecom circle issued a notice asking for payment within "11.49 pm" on Friday. This meant that the firms had to pay within 8 to 10 hours of receiving the notice. Then, a show-cause notice was issued to those involved in taking the decision to issue the restraining order to explain why such a lenient view was taken by them despite the Supreme Court's order directing the telcos to pay by January 25.

But the way the government tried to insulate itself from the DoT order was disgusting on the one hand and scary on the other. It was scary because if one believes the government's stand that telecom minister Ravi Shankar Prasad and DoT secretary Anshu Prasad were unaware of the said order then one must seriously wonder how this country is being run. How can a desk officer (even with the 'connivance' of Member (Finance) DoT) issue an order impacting the collection of over Rs 1.4L crore without keeping the minister and the secretary in the loop? Further, did not the minister and the secretary keep themselves abreast of the situation and question the officials about the status of the payment once the Supreme Court mandated deadline passed? The attempt to shield the minister and the secretary was disgusting for this very reason.

The government must make a proper inquiry and punish all those involved in lowering the dignity of the apex court as well as delaying the recovery of such huge dues. Then, it should take a decision to provide as much relief as it can to the telcos, by waiving off penalties and interests, if any and perhaps allow them to pay the balance in installments. The sooner this murky affair is closed, the better it will be for all concerned.