oppn parties Former Cricket Boss 'Guilty' of Conflict of Interest

News Snippets

  • Flipkart assures employees that there will be no job or salary cuts due to the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Although it was obvious, but the government still clarifies that there is no need to switch off appliances and only lights need to be switched off on April 5 at 9pm after confusion in the minds of some people
  • PM Modi and President Trump decide "to deploy full strength of (Indo-US) partnership" to fight against COVID-19
  • 17 states have reported 1023 cases of coronavirus linked to the Tablighi Jamaat, which translates to 30% of all positive cases in India
  • The government says people should not use alcohol-based hand sanitizers before lighting diyas or candles on April 5
  • The railways say there is no certainty yet when services will resume after the lockdown and a final decision will be taken in the next few days
  • As coronavirus cases multiply in Assam, six north-east states seal their borders with the state
  • Power System Operation Corporation Ltd. (POCOSO) putting all systems and protocols in place at war-footing to ensure there is no grid failure due to reduction in demand on April 5 at 9 pm
  • Power ministry scotches rumours that the power grid might fail due to the 9-minute blackout called by PM Modi on Sunday, April 5
  • Centre asks people to wear home-made masks if it is absolutely essential for them to step out of homes
  • Centre asks states to allow licensed street vendors to sell essential items
  • 8000 samples were tested across India on April 2, but the government said that testing will be need-based and will not be used as a confidence-boosting measure
  • Air India operating special flights to fly passengers stuck in India since the lockdown
  • For the first time in history, Darjeeling loses first flush tea due to suspension of garden work for Covid-19 outbreak
  • Supreme Court asks journalists to be responsible and publish only the official version of news after it was brought to its notice that migrant exodus started after the 'fake' news that the lockdown will be extended to three months
Total count stands ar 3082 as India records 16 Covid-19 deaths, the highest in a single day
oppn parties
Former Cricket Boss 'Guilty' of Conflict of Interest

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2015-01-22 20:24:00

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
Finally, N Srinivasan, the erstwhile BCCI boss, has been made to see things as they should be and not as he wants them to be. Srini always wanted to have his cake and eat it too. With impunity, he continued to hold the dual posts of BCCI chief and owner of Chennai Super Kingsâ€â"¢ in the IPL on the back of the rule 6.2.4 inserted in the BCCI constitution that bypassed the conflict of interest charges. The Supreme Court has struck down the rule as illegal, saying that it was in conflict with natural justice. The apex court has called for BCCI elections within 6 weeks of its order, saying that Srini has to make a choice. He can only contest if he gives up the ownership of CSK or if CSK withdraws from the IPL. As things stand, he is barred from contesting. I am sure a person like Srinivasan would now try to maximize his gains by giving up his BCCI fixation and would try to make maximum money from his IPL team. Worst, he could try and control the BCCI by proxy.

But two things go against him. By continuing to hanker after the BCCI post even though the SC had made unflattering remarks about him, Srinivasan has antagonized many people. They have now seen him for what he is: a seeker of power and privileges without having any interest in the benefit of cricket. Secondly, the Court has appointed a committee headed by retired chief justice of the SC, R M Lodha, to find out whether CSK and Rajasthan Royal should stay in the IPL and what changes should be made in the BCCI constitution. As the full import of the SC decision reaches the affiliates who make up the BCCI, one is sure no one will touch Srinivasan with even a barge pole. He is going to become a pariah after this.

One more screw that has been tightened by the SC is the fact that it has found Srinivasanâ€â"¢s son-in-law Meiyappan and Rajasthan Royalâ€â"¢s owner Kundra guilty of betting on the IPL. Since they had privileged team information, theirs is a crime equivalent to insider trading in stock markets. Srinivasan had tried his utmost to protect Meiyappan, even getting M S Dhoni to certify that Meiyappan was in no way connected to CSK. But facts spoke otherwise. Meiyappan was spotted in team dug outs and was present during auctions and other team functions. Although the court has not said that Srini was personally involved in Meiyappanâ€â"¢s wrongdoings, he is guilty of allowing his son-in-law unrestricted access to the team. As BCCI chief, he should have known that if Meiyappan was not connected with the CSK, he had no business to be at all team events, including the auctions.

The East zone was sponsoring Srinivasan this time for the BCCI presidentâ€â"¢s election. Whatever equation Srini had managed with Bengal cricket chief Jagmohan Dalmiya will not remain valid after this court order. Dalmiya is an astute administrator. He is not likely to support Srinivasan anymore. Sharad Pawar, Shashank Manohar and Lalit Modi have already welcomed the SC order. But they are known Srinivasan baiters. As long as Srini has the support of Arun Jaitley, he can hope to salvage something. But is Jaitley still going to support him? One thing is clear, Indian cricket is going to go through a churning process. New alignments will emerge.

The Justice Lodha committee should examine the BCCI constitution in detail and remove all clauses that make it an unaccountable body – a private club of sorts. While it collects huge amounts from the game, no one knows in detail what it does with this money. Also, some way should be devised to make it mandatory for former players of repute to be in the BCCI. These players could be either of international or national level, but they should have played a certain minimum matches and not be someone who played a few matches but knows the right people. There should be 50 percent reservation for former players in the elections to the BCCI posts, right down to the affiliated associations. For the affiliates, the rule should be for players who have played an x number of Ranji trophy matches as all associations will not have former Test or ODI players.

The time has come to set the house of Indian cricket in order. If making money was the only objective, than the BCCI has been doing a great job. But if looking after the game is the main reason of its existence, the Board will get just 5/10 points. The Supreme Court has done well to appoint the Lodha committee. Now it is time for all stakeholders to come forward and help it in revamping the Board so that people like Srinivasan cannot use it for personal gain in future and some amount of public accountability is enforced.