oppn parties IPL Sponsorship: Tatas Come On Board To Relieve Vivo

News Snippets

  • R G Kar rape-murder hearing start in Kolkata's Sealdah court on Monday
  • Calcutta HC rules that a person cannot be indicted for consensual sex after promise of marriage even if he reneges on that promise later
  • Cryptocurrencies jump after Trump's win, Bitcoin goes past $84K while Dogecoin jumps 50%
  • Vistara merges with Air India today
  • GST Council to decide on zero tax on term plans and select health covers in its Dec 21-22 meeting
  • SIP inflows stood at a record Rs 25323cr in October
  • Chess: Chennai GM tournament - Aravindh Chithambaram shares the top spot with two others
  • Asian Champions Trophy hockey for women: India thrash Malaysia 4-0
  • Batteries, chains and screws were among 65 objects found in the stomach of a 14-year-old Hathras boy who died after these objects were removed in a complex surgery at Delhi's Safdarjung Hospital
  • India confirms that 'verification patrolling' is on at Demchok and Depsang in Ladakh after disengagement of troops
  • LeT commander and 2 other terrorists killed in Srinagar in a gunbattle with security forces. 4 security personnel injured too.
  • Man arrested in Nagpur for sending hoax emails to the PMO in order to get his book published
  • Adani Power sets a deadline of November 7 for Bangladesh to clear its dues, failing which the company will stop supplying power to the nation
  • Shubman Gill (90) and Rishabh Pant (60) ensure India get a lead in the final Test after which Ashwin and Jadeja reduce the visitors to 171 for 9 in the second innings
  • Final Test versus New Zealand: Match evenly poised as NZ are 143 ahead with 1 wicket in hand
Security forces gun down 10 'armed militants' in Manipur's Jiribam district but locals say those killed were village volunteers and claim that 11, and not 10, were killed
oppn parties
IPL Sponsorship: Tatas Come On Board To Relieve Vivo

By Slogger
First publised on 2022-01-11 14:32:34

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Holding an extreme view and carting the ball out of the park is what interests him most. He is a hard hitter at all times. Fasten your seatbelts and read.

In an excellent development, the BCCI has facilitated a deal between the Tatas and the Chinese mobile handset maker Vivo through which Vivo will exit from the sponsorship of the IPL this year and the Tatas will step in. Vivo had earlier said that it was not getting traction through IPL sponsorship as it was paying a huge amount every year. It was looking to get out of the deal but the terms were such that it would have to bring a replacement on board or otherwise fulfill its financial commitments for the entire duration of the contract. Through this deal, which is win-win situation for all concerned, Vivo has been allowed a smooth exit route.

Vivo's sponsorship of the IPL has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Earlier, there was political bickering when it first came on board. Later the company realized that the investment was way more than the traction it was getting. Now, with the investigating agencies on the back of all Chinese handset makers operating in India, things are turning impossible. The deal with Vivo, signed in 2017 for Rs 2199cr for five years meant a payout of Rs 440cr every year. Vivo wanted out but was constrained by the replacement clause.

Although the terms of the deal signed by the BCCI with the Tatas have not been made public, Jay Shah, the BCCI honorary secretary issued a statement where he welcomed the Tatas as sponsors by saying that "we are truly happy that India's largest and most trusted business groups has believed in the IPL story and together with the Tata Group, we will look to take Indian cricket and the IPL forward to greater heights."

But the problems faced by Vivo should lead to a rethink on long term sponsorship contracts with binding clauses when such huge sums are involved. Although getting a sponsor on board is a time consuming process and also involves costs, the way out could be inviting bids for five years at a time but with separate yearly contracts. The deal could then be awarded to a single sponsor for all the five years or to multiple sponsors for one or more years.