oppn parties IPL Sponsorship: Tatas Come On Board To Relieve Vivo

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
IPL Sponsorship: Tatas Come On Board To Relieve Vivo

By Slogger
First publised on 2022-01-11 14:32:34

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Holding an extreme view and carting the ball out of the park is what interests him most. He is a hard hitter at all times. Fasten your seatbelts and read.

In an excellent development, the BCCI has facilitated a deal between the Tatas and the Chinese mobile handset maker Vivo through which Vivo will exit from the sponsorship of the IPL this year and the Tatas will step in. Vivo had earlier said that it was not getting traction through IPL sponsorship as it was paying a huge amount every year. It was looking to get out of the deal but the terms were such that it would have to bring a replacement on board or otherwise fulfill its financial commitments for the entire duration of the contract. Through this deal, which is win-win situation for all concerned, Vivo has been allowed a smooth exit route.

Vivo's sponsorship of the IPL has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Earlier, there was political bickering when it first came on board. Later the company realized that the investment was way more than the traction it was getting. Now, with the investigating agencies on the back of all Chinese handset makers operating in India, things are turning impossible. The deal with Vivo, signed in 2017 for Rs 2199cr for five years meant a payout of Rs 440cr every year. Vivo wanted out but was constrained by the replacement clause.

Although the terms of the deal signed by the BCCI with the Tatas have not been made public, Jay Shah, the BCCI honorary secretary issued a statement where he welcomed the Tatas as sponsors by saying that "we are truly happy that India's largest and most trusted business groups has believed in the IPL story and together with the Tata Group, we will look to take Indian cricket and the IPL forward to greater heights."

But the problems faced by Vivo should lead to a rethink on long term sponsorship contracts with binding clauses when such huge sums are involved. Although getting a sponsor on board is a time consuming process and also involves costs, the way out could be inviting bids for five years at a time but with separate yearly contracts. The deal could then be awarded to a single sponsor for all the five years or to multiple sponsors for one or more years.