oppn parties Is There Actually A Need To Mediate in Shaheen Bagh? If They Are Inconveniencing the Public, They Should Shift, If Not, They Can Remain There

News Snippets

  • University vice-chancellors in West Bengal decide not to hold final-year examinations despite UGC prod, will instead go by the state government advised 80-20 formula where 80% will be marked on performance in past semesters and 20% on internal assessments in the final semester
  • The Centre wants the ITI and other top Indian firms to bid for 5G as Chinese firms Huawei and ZTE are not likely to be allowed to participate
  • India and China agree on total disengagement to return to peace ahead of the next round of military talks
  • The Supreme Court allows delivery of summons and notices via WhatsApp and email, but questions remain on proof of actual receipt
  • National Investigation Agency says the proceeds from the Kerala gold smuggling case could have been used for terrorist activities
  • Four Maoists shot dead in Valmiki Tiger Reserve in Bihar
  • Despite localized lockdown, Covid cases continue to rise at an alarming rate in West Bengal. Newer areas brought under containment zones in Kolkata
  • ICSE, ISC results declared, Average scores in the English paper, 20% lower this year than the average in most years, pulls down the aggregate for most candidates
  • IIP contracts by 35% in May. Manufacturing goes down by 39.3%
  • Row erupts over CBSE's decision to reduce the syllabus by 30% this academic year due to the disruption caused by the pandemic. Experts say several lessons that the ruling dispensation does not like are being removed
  • Gangster Vikas Dubey's nephew killed in an encounter by UP police who also pick up his key aide Raju Khullar and his son Adarsh
  • MHA sets up an inter-ministerial committee to probe the alleged financial misdeeds of three trusts linked to the Gandhi family
  • Actor Jagdeep, most famous for his Soorma Bhopali act in Sholay, passes away
  • Pakistan says Kulbhushan Jadhav has declined to file a review petition and will stick to his mercy plea. India calls it a farce
  • India to keep a strict vigil to confirm that the Chinese are abiding by the deal on the pullback at the LAC
Gangster Vikas Dubey's 'encounter' raises several questions and the Yogi government is under fire for allegedly getting him killed in a 'staged' encounter to prevent the exposure of the nexus between criminals and the administration in the state
oppn parties
Is There Actually A Need To Mediate in Shaheen Bagh? If They Are Inconveniencing the Public, They Should Shift, If Not, They Can Remain There

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2020-02-21 21:45:52

The Supreme Court is spot on in saying that while a set of people have the democratic right to protest peacefully against anything of importance, they do not have the right to inconvenience another, maybe much bigger, set of people by their actions. The court categorically said that there is a need to strike a balance between the rights of the protestors and the rights of the general public. While the court said this in the context of the Shaheen Bagh protest that has blocked a major and busy thoroughfare in Delhi which has inconvenienced the general public, it holds true for any protest by a group of citizens, any organization or a political party.

But one feels that the Supreme Court has erred in appointing a team of mediators to talk to the protestors about shifting to a less inconveniencing venue. There is either the fact that the current venue is inconveniencing the general public or the fact that it is not. If it is the former, then the court should have taken cognizance of the fact and ordered the protestors to shift. If it is the latter, then the court should have allowed them to keep protesting from the current venue. But why talk with a set of people who have willfully chosen a venue that is causing maximum inconvenience to the general public. In one's opinion, it will set a dangerous precedent and other people at other times would willfully occupy public spaces to hold protests that will throw traffic out of gear and inconvenience the general public.

There is no doubt that the Shaheen Bagh protestors have the right to protest about CAA as they feel that it will be detrimental to the Muslim community. But will their views be better heard if they block roads? Or will they be better heard if espoused articulately and forcefully from any venue? Hence, before asking the government to repeal the act, they should outline what they feel is offensive in it for them as Indian citizens? Critics of the act say that it makes religion as the test of citizenship. Is that true? The CAA seeks to grant accelerated citizenship (the refugees would, in any case, get citizenship in 11 years, CAA just shortens the waiting period to 5 years) to persecuted minorities from neighbouring countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. The persecuted minorities for this amendment have been defined as Hindu, Sikh, Parsi, Buddhist and Christian. It is obvious that since all the three countries are Muslim-majority nations, Muslims cannot be part of the persecuted minorities there. Hence, it is logical that Muslims have not been included. What is wrong with that? How does it affect the rights of Indian citizens who are Muslim and why are they protesting against this?

Actually, the main protest is against the NRC and the NPR, which is another matter altogether. The way the NPR questionnaire has been designed and the way the NRC exercise was conducted in Assam, it is clear that it is aimed at profiling citizens based on their religion and such an exercise has no place in a secular nation like India. Although Amit Shah has said that people need not answer questions related to the date of birth and place of birth of their parents in the NPR form and that no documents need to shown, the concerns remain. If what Amit Shah has said will be done, then what is the need for the NPR? In any case, the Census is due in 2021 and since a major part of the NPR exercise is just a duplication of the Census, the government should seriously consider dropping the exercise. But the protestors should also see the difference between the CAA, the NPR and the NRC and stop linking the three. Else, they should spell out clearly and in detail how they think that the CAA will infringe on any of their rights as Indian citizens. The government will then be bound to answer, regardless of the fact that it is an act passed by the parliament of the country. Better still, everyone should wait for the Supreme Court to decide whether what the parliament has passed passes the constitutional test.