oppn parties Is There Actually A Need To Mediate in Shaheen Bagh? If They Are Inconveniencing the Public, They Should Shift, If Not, They Can Remain There

Story Of The Day

When The Family of a Girl Becomes the Police, Judge and Executioner

October 27, 2026

People Are Talking About

People Are Talking About Junk Food Near Schools

News Snippets

  • Digital News Publishers Association, a group of 21 of India's leading news media organisations, is likely to challenge the constitutional validity of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act and rules as it feels they infringe of the right to freedom of speech and expression and threatens to curb journalistic activity
  • A special MP-MLA court in Sultanpur acuitted Rahul Gandhi in the 2018 defamation case over rally remark on Amit Shah for lack of evidence
  • Cyclone Arnab intensified over the Bay of Bengal on Monday, prompting Andhra Pradesh and Odisha to accelerate preparations for its expected landfall on October 28. Andhra Pradesh identified approximately 570,000 people as vulnerable, began evacuation preparations and ordered schools in affected districts to close from October 27 to 31, while Odisha mobilised disaster-response teams and prepared shelters in vulnerable areas
  • The Supreme Court assured voters whose names were deleted during the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls that they would not face prosecution for reapplying to register through Form 6. The court sought the Election Commission’s response to concerns that previously registered voters had no dedicated form for seeking restoration of their names, and scheduled the next hearing for November 5
  • The Election Commission told the Supreme Court that decisions concerning the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls had been taken unanimously and opposed a plea seeking to restrain Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar from functioning. In its counter-affidavit, the Commission also defended its decision-making process and argued that the challenge to the CEC’s functioning was legally unsustainable
  • The Supreme Court granted two rival factions of the Trinamool Congress 20 additional days to complete their submissions before the Election Commission in the dispute over the party’s name and election symbol. The factions led by Mamata Banerjee and Ritabrata Banerjee will have successive 10-day periods to submit their pleadings and supporting documents
  • Gujarat declared Kutch, Devbhumi Dwarka, Jamnagar and Porbandar drought-affected after uneven monsoon rainfall, despite the state receiving approximately 89% of its normal rainfall overall. Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel announced crop-loss assistance of ₹8,500 per hectare, capped at two hectares per farmer, along with livestock support and up to 150 days of rural employment in affected areas
  • Tata Communications announced plans to invest $400–450 million over three to five years in approximately 10,000 kilometres of fibre infrastructure connecting India’s major data centres and artificial-intelligence hubs
  • Students at Jamia Millia Islamia continued their protest on Monday after the university announced that students’ union elections would be held within 15 days of approval of the union constitution. Protesters demanded a clear election timetable and the appointment of a chief election officer, while the university revoked some disciplinary notices
  • Delhi Police arrested seven people after an investigation into an undelivered online clothing order allegedly uncovered a cyber-fraud network that routed transactions worth more than ₹30 crore through multiple bank accounts. The case began with a complaint over a ₹799 kurti that had not been delivered, according to police reporting
  • The rupee weakened for a third consecutive trading session on Monday, falling approximately 0.3% to ₹95.185 against the US dollar. Higher crude-oil prices, increased dollar purchases by importers and foreign investor outflows added pressure to the currency ahead of the US Federal Reserve’s policy decision
  • Indian equity markets recovered on Monday, ending a four-session losing streak as stronger corporate earnings encouraged buying across several sectors. The Sensex gained 482.92 points, or 0.66%, to close at 73,606.75, while the Nifty 50 advanced 153.20 points, or 0.68%, to 22,753.20
  • Indian batter Devdutt Padikkal scored 199 against New Zealand A in the first unofficial Test at Lincoln, missing a double century by one run. India A reached 488 for eight in its second innings by the end of the third day, establishing an overall lead of 284 runs with two days remaining
  • India’s Under-15 football team defeated Bahrain 4–3 at the FIFA U-15 World Cup and Festival in Azerbaijan, maintaining its position at the top of Group K after four matches. R Lalremruatfela scored twice, while Macdonnish Ngairangbam and Nibas Meetei Wahengbam also found the net
  • The latest round of Ranji Trophy matches began on Monday with Madhya Pradesh spinner Saransh Jain taking seven wickets as Bihar were dismissed for 99, while Delhi reached 309 for five against Jharkhand after captain Ayush Badoni scored an unbeaten 106. Mumbai also made a strong start against Haryana, reaching 290 for three after centuries from Angkrish Raghuvanshi and Musheer Khan. Bengal were in trouble at 172 for 6 against Kerala
Election Commission tells Supreme Court that the June 2025 SIR decision taken 'unanimously'
oppn parties
Is There Actually A Need To Mediate in Shaheen Bagh? If They Are Inconveniencing the Public, They Should Shift, If Not, They Can Remain There

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2020-02-21 21:45:52

The Supreme Court is spot on in saying that while a set of people have the democratic right to protest peacefully against anything of importance, they do not have the right to inconvenience another, maybe much bigger, set of people by their actions. The court categorically said that there is a need to strike a balance between the rights of the protestors and the rights of the general public. While the court said this in the context of the Shaheen Bagh protest that has blocked a major and busy thoroughfare in Delhi which has inconvenienced the general public, it holds true for any protest by a group of citizens, any organization or a political party.

But one feels that the Supreme Court has erred in appointing a team of mediators to talk to the protestors about shifting to a less inconveniencing venue. There is either the fact that the current venue is inconveniencing the general public or the fact that it is not. If it is the former, then the court should have taken cognizance of the fact and ordered the protestors to shift. If it is the latter, then the court should have allowed them to keep protesting from the current venue. But why talk with a set of people who have willfully chosen a venue that is causing maximum inconvenience to the general public. In one's opinion, it will set a dangerous precedent and other people at other times would willfully occupy public spaces to hold protests that will throw traffic out of gear and inconvenience the general public.

There is no doubt that the Shaheen Bagh protestors have the right to protest about CAA as they feel that it will be detrimental to the Muslim community. But will their views be better heard if they block roads? Or will they be better heard if espoused articulately and forcefully from any venue? Hence, before asking the government to repeal the act, they should outline what they feel is offensive in it for them as Indian citizens? Critics of the act say that it makes religion as the test of citizenship. Is that true? The CAA seeks to grant accelerated citizenship (the refugees would, in any case, get citizenship in 11 years, CAA just shortens the waiting period to 5 years) to persecuted minorities from neighbouring countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. The persecuted minorities for this amendment have been defined as Hindu, Sikh, Parsi, Buddhist and Christian. It is obvious that since all the three countries are Muslim-majority nations, Muslims cannot be part of the persecuted minorities there. Hence, it is logical that Muslims have not been included. What is wrong with that? How does it affect the rights of Indian citizens who are Muslim and why are they protesting against this?


Actually, the main protest is against the NRC and the NPR, which is another matter altogether. The way the NPR questionnaire has been designed and the way the NRC exercise was conducted in Assam, it is clear that it is aimed at profiling citizens based on their religion and such an exercise has no place in a secular nation like India. Although Amit Shah has said that people need not answer questions related to the date of birth and place of birth of their parents in the NPR form and that no documents need to shown, the concerns remain. If what Amit Shah has said will be done, then what is the need for the NPR? In any case, the Census is due in 2021 and since a major part of the NPR exercise is just a duplication of the Census, the government should seriously consider dropping the exercise. But the protestors should also see the difference between the CAA, the NPR and the NRC and stop linking the three. Else, they should spell out clearly and in detail how they think that the CAA will infringe on any of their rights as Indian citizens. The government will then be bound to answer, regardless of the fact that it is an act passed by the parliament of the country. Better still, everyone should wait for the Supreme Court to decide whether what the parliament has passed passes the constitutional test.

Other Stories You Make Like

Editorials

Privacy Must Not Become a Shield for Power

Privacy Must Not Become a Shield for Power

 The Foreign Hand Is Not an Answer

The Foreign Hand Is Not an Answer

In Depth

Grounds Of Arrest: The Supreme Court's Rule Must Be Followed By The Police On The Ground

Grounds Of Arrest: The Supreme Court's Rule Must Be Followed By The Police On The Ground

Editor's Pick

For the Goonj to Reverberate, Rahul Gandhi Must Take Regional Parties Along

For the Goonj to Reverberate, Rahul Gandhi Must Take Regional Parties Along
© 2014 India Commentary. All rights reserved.