oppn parties Law To Build Temple At Disputed Site In Ayodhya Would Be Disastrous

News Snippets

  • Justice Surya Kaqnt sworn in as the 53rd CJI. Says free speech needs to be strengthened
  • Plume originating from volacnic ash in Ehtiopia might delay flights in India today
  • Supreme Court drops the fraud case against the Sandesaras brothers after they agree to pay back Rs 5100 cr. It gives them time till Dec 17 to deposit the money. The court took pains to say that this order should not be seen as a precedent in such crimes.
  • Chinese authorities detain a woman from Arunachal Pradesh who was travelling with her Indian passport. India lodges strong protest
  • S&P predicts India's economy to grow at 6.5% in FY26
  • The December MPC meet of RBI may reduce rates as the nation has seen steaqdy growth with little or no inflation
  • World Boxing Cup Finals: Hitesh Gulia wins gold in 70kgs
  • Kabaddi World Cup: Indian Women win their second consecutive title at Dhaka, beating Taipei 35-28
  • Second Test versus South Africa: M Jansen destroys India as the hosts lose all hopes of squaring the series. India out for 201, conceding a lead of 288 runs which effectively means that South Africa are set to win the match and the series
  • Defence minister Rajnath Singh said that Sindh may be back in India
  • After its total rejection by voters in Bihar, the Congress high command said that it happened to to 'vote chori' by the NDA and forced elimination of voters in the SIR
  • Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) fined a Patna cafe Rs 30000 for adding service charge on the bill of a customer after it was found that the billing software at the cafe was doing it for all patrons
  • Kolkata HC rules that the sewadars (managers) of a debuttar (Deity's) property need not take permission from the court for developing the property
  • Ministry of Home Affairs said that there were no plans to introduce a bill to change the status of Chandigarh in the ensuing winter session of Parliament
  • A 20-year-old escort and her agent were held in connection with the murder of a CA in a Kolkata hotel
Iconic actor Dharmendra is no more, cremated at Pawan Hans crematorium in Juhu, Mumbai
oppn parties
Law To Build Temple At Disputed Site In Ayodhya Would Be Disastrous

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-10-30 13:58:38

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
The Ayodhya land dispute case is being heard in the Supreme Court. Land dispute cases take time. But the BJP, having made the promise of constructing the Ram Mandir to its voters, is in a fix. As the general elections approach, it wanted the apex court to fast-track the matter. But the court has refused to do so and has ordered that an appropriate bench will hear the same in January.

But this is not going to deter the Hindutva brigade. Already, there is a clamour for the government to enact a special law to facilitate the acquisition of the disputed land and construction of the temple. This amounts to changing the goal posts. The matter is being heard in court and both parties have agreed to abide by the decision. Hence, something as drastic as acquisition amounts to high handedness and cheating and is likely to create a lot of friction between both the communities.

Instead, the matter should be tackled at two levels. In the first, the law should be allowed to take its own course. Both parties should produce ownership documents and proof and try to convince the court. In the second, despite community level talks having failed in the past, there should be a renewed attempt by prominent Hindus to explore the line of bringing the Muslim community on board in allowing the construction of the temple, with a mosque being constructed at another spot nearby.

Historically, there is no doubt that the damaged mosque was constructed by Emperor Babar of the Mughal dynasty. There is also no doubt that Babar was not an indigenous ruler – he was an invader. It can be assumed that he could have razed a temple to construct the mosque. This assumption is based on the findings of the ASI and the expansionist tendencies of the then Muslim kings and their marauding armies. They used to treat adherents of all other religions as kafirs and tried to raze monuments of other religions from lands they conquered. Having assumed this, it does automatically give Hindus the right to raze the mosque and construct a temple in its place. But if the Muslim community agrees, the problem will be solved.

But efforts to convince the Muslims have failed in the past and are likely to fail again. So there is nothing much any law-abiding citizen or a registered political party can do other than wait for the decision of the court. Ideas such as a special law to acquire the land should be junked immediately if peace and harmony are to prevail. History is a great teacher. It reminds us what had happened in our country in the past. If we go around obliterating monuments of invaders, our future generations will live in the belief that we were always free. Should we allow our future generations to believe in falsehood? The Ram Mandir must be constructed if Hindus want it. But not by trampling upon the law or creating disharmony between communities.