oppn parties Mohua Moitra Is Defending The Indefensible

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Mohua Moitra Is Defending The Indefensible

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2023-11-03 05:29:56

TMC leader Mohua Moitra has landed in a soup. She was found to have (and she has subsequently admitted to doing so) shared her Parliament website login credentials to a private citizen who was not part of her team to post questions on her behalf and more damagingly she did so in return of gifts. Whatever explanation she is giving is not holding good for the simple reason that although MPs do share login information with their team, they are not allowed to do so with outsiders. Moitra's team has taken pains to point out that the login information shared was only to post questions and was not a security threat as alleged by the BJP.

Moitra first tried to justify her action by saying that it was common for MPs to share login information with selected individuals who wanted them to ask questions so that they could post them on their own. But her contention is not true. While some other MPs might be doing so, it is not a common thing. It is a breach of privilege. 

Then she tried to say that the favours she received from the person to whom she gave her login information and who subsequently posted questions to be asked in her name in Parliament (many of these questions were posted from a Dubai IP address) were very small like some makeup items and a scarf. Does that in anyway reduce her intransigence? For, she is admitting to receiving these items but maybe hiding information about other things that she received. 

She has said that she wants to cross examine the person who has filed a sworn affidavit. The Ethics Committee will do so and if needed afford her an opportunity to cross examine the person. She will also get the chance to cross examine in court as she has already filed a criminal defamation case against several persons.

Moitra, along with several opposition members, walked out of the questioning session with the Ethics Committee as she felt they were asking "inappropriate" and filthy questions. She termed the exercise "vastraharan". The Committee has denied any such questioning and has said they just wanted to bring out her relationship with the complainant. They said she was trying to play the 'victim card'.

There is no denying that what Moitra has done is morally and ethically wrong. That is why even her party is not defending her.