oppn parties Nirbhaya Case: Justice Done, Time To Revisit The Judicial Process

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court asks journalists to be responsible and publish only the official version of news after it was brought to its notice that migrant exodus started after the 'fake' news that the lockdown will be extended to three months
  • Small saving rates slashed by the government by 140 basis points
  • The Centre says that the exodus of the migrants was stopped to save villages and prevent community transmission
  • The Centre says March 31 will remain the closing date for FY 2019-2020 and no change will be made for Covid-19 disruption
  • Tablighi Jamaat fiasco puts several states on high alert, attendees and their contacts being traced
  • Stock markets recover on the last day of the financial year, but the sentiment remains weak
  • The government says Covid-19 is still in local transmission stage in India
  • Government scotches rumours of extending the lockdown beyond April14. Says no such plan
  • Centre asks states to give shelter and food to migrant workers to stop them from taking to the streets
  • RBI cuts repo rate by 75 bps, the steepest in 10 years
  • Centre writes to states regarding laxity in monitoring people who had arrived from abroad between January and March
  • Kerala reports a spurt in new cases
  • With 124 fresh cases on Friday, the number of reported cases in India stand at 854
  • Five of a family, including a 9-month-old-baby test positive for Covid-19 in Nadia district in West Bengal on Friday
  • The Pakistani army is reportedly forcibly moving all Covid-19 patients to PoK and Gilgit
Total count crosses 1600 in India with 52 deaths and 146 recoveries on Tuesday, spurt in cases in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu
oppn parties
Nirbhaya Case: Justice Done, Time To Revisit The Judicial Process

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-03-20 13:05:16

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

Finally, justice has been done. The Nirbhaya rapists were hanged at 5.30 am today in Tihar jail after they exhausted all legal remedies available to them. It took more than seven years for the final closure of the case and it raised several questions about the laws, the legal process and the way in which defense lawyers tried to pick loopholes in the system. If one believes that the certainty of justice is more a deterrent than the severity of punishment, the Nirbhaya case provided proof that the law needs to be revamped so that criminals and their lawyers do not delay the process interminably. The whole country watched in disbelief as several death warrants came to naught due to the mechanisms of the defense lawyers who tried every trick in the book to delay the inevitable.

The first rule that needs revision is the one in the jail manual in Delhi that provides that if more than one person is awarded the death penalty in a single case, all of them are to be hanged together. It was this rule that allowed lawyers to file individual petitions for each of the remedies available to the death row convicts separately and delay the process for more than five months. Either the jail rule should be revised to provide for individual hangings when every remedy is exhausted for each individual convict or the relevant law should be changed to provide that if more than one person is awarded the death penalty in a single case, they have to jointly use all remedies available to them. As the latter will be difficult to implement, the jail rule should be revised forthwith.

Then, there are many layers of petitions and objections and curative petitions that the death row convicts can avail of. Some of these appear frivolous and are just used to delay the process. The whole process needs a thorough reexamination by legal experts and the Law Commission. There should be a predefined guideline with timelines that death row convicts can avail of as legal remedy once the Supreme Court confirms their sentences. No deviation should be allowed from that guideline under any circumstance. That would ensure that everything is transparent and defense lawyers cannot discover newer loopholes just to delay things and make a mockery of the legal process.