oppn parties Political Meddling in Students' Dispute Ends in a Suicide

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court says all cases of mob violence and lynchings should not be given a communal angle
  • Supreme Court tells petitioners who want elections to be held with ballot papers as they fear EVM tampering to back their claims of tampering with data
  • PM Modi says he is indebted to the Constitution which is an article of paith for his party
  • Mamata Banerjee says people do not have freedom to eat what they want under NDA then how can they have freedom to speak
  • Bengal, wary of clashes on Ramnavami, has tightened security all over the state, especially in pockets that witnessed such clashes in previous years
  • Ramdev and Balkrishna of Patanjali offered apology to the Supreme Court for misleading advertisement with folded hands. The apex court had earlier said their apology was not worth the paper it was written on
  • A whistleblower has claimed that China bribed senior UN officials to keep the lab leak angle out of reasons for spread of Covid
  • Two men from Bihar were arrested from Gujarat for firing at actor Salman Khan's home on Sunday morning. Mumbai Police said they wanted to kill the actor
  • Supreme Court order West Bengal governor to appoint VCs to six universities from the names provided by the state government in one week
  • Wow! Momo raises Rs 70cr from Z3Partners in the latest round of funding
  • IMF raises India's growth forecast from 6.5% earlier to 6.8%
  • Re plunges to a new low of 83.54 per dollar as global tensions mount
  • Stocks remain weak and negative on Tuesday: Sensex plunges 456 points to 72943 and Nifty 124 points to 22147
  • Candidates' Chess: D Gukesh draws with Ian Nepomniachtchi and with six points each, both reamin joint leaders. Pragg also drew with Vidit Gujrathi
  • IPL: Table-toppers RR beat KKR by 2 wickets
Encounter at Kanker in Bastar in Chhatisgarh: 29 Maoists, including 3 'senior commanders' gunned down by security forces
oppn parties
Political Meddling in Students' Dispute Ends in a Suicide

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-01-20 12:14:23

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
Rohith Vemula’s suicide in Hyderabad has brought into focus how party politics by senior leaders is destroying our education institutions. What started as a matter of student politics in Hyderabad Central University resulted in Vemula’s sad death only because first Union minister Bandaru Dattatreya chose to interfere in the matter and then when HRD minister Smriti Irani’s office wrote several times to the vice-chancellor of the university to act on the minister’s complaint. In the process, five dalit students were expelled from the hostel and prevented from using all facilities except attending their classes. This kind of social ostracism can destroy a person and Vemula was not strong enough to fight back. He chose to end his life rather than bear the daily insult. The police have rightly booked Dattatreya and vice-chancellor Appa Rao for abetting his suicide and violating the SC/ST act.

The flashpoint was a clash between the BJP’s student wing, the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) activists and those of Ambedkar Students Union (ASU) in August last year at the university campus. Students unions are known to clash over many things, including cornering of facilities by any one union that is in power. But that is something they resolve over time through peer contact and negotiations. But post the NDA victory at the Centre, the ABVP seems to be in a tearing hurry to gain control of most colleges in India. Hence it chose to involve Dattatreya in the matter. What is surprising that the minister willingly participated in a plan to ostracize dalit students, not realizing that he could be booked for violating the SC/ST Act.

Also surprising is the HRD minister’s repeated missives to the vice-chancellor to act on Dattatreya’s complaint. Smriti Irani must have mindlessly asked Appa Rao to do so, without going into the merits of the case. She should have realized that if the matter was of any seriousness, the vice-chancellor would have acted on his own accord. For no vice-chancellor would tolerate gross indiscipline on his campus. But since the matter was of a clash between two students’ unions that did not involve the university, it was not a matter for the administration to act upon. The police had been informed about the clash and the law would have taken its own course. Irani should have told Dattatreya not to involve himself in the conflict of the students. Sadly, we do not have ministers who can tell a colleague to back off, nor do we have vice-chancellors who can tell a minister that the merits of the case do not warrant action against the students. A bright young scholar lost his life as politicians played games and the vice-chancellor lacked the guts to counter them.