oppn parties Retrospective Tax Laws Scare Away Investors

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Retrospective Tax Laws Scare Away Investors

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-12-24 06:36:38

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It is very difficult, almost impossible, to change tax laws with retrospective effect and then demand huge amounts as tax arrears from foreign companies, sometimes bypassing tax treaties between nations. The Indian government has been made to understand this in the most embarrassing manner by first losing the Vodafone case and now the Cairn Energy case in the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague.

In the Cairn Energy case, the Indian income tax department had seized 10 percent shares of the Indian subsidiary of the company, then valued at over $ 1 billion as the company had disputed and refused to pay the tax demand raised on it. The court of arbitration has now held that seizure illegal and has ordered the government to refund the amount along with interest and costs. The total outgo for the government, as per the order, will be about $1.4 billion.

The dispute with Cairn arose as it reorganized its business in India after obtaining permission from the Foreign Investment Promotion Board. None of the government departments raised any objections or indicated that the company would have to pay such huge taxes. But later, the company was asked to pay capital gains tax with retrospective effect on the reorganization of assets. That also went against the tax treaty India has with the UK. The court has now ruled that the company did not receive fair and equitable treatment under the bilateral investment treaty between India and the UK.

The Indian government has the right to appeal against the award. But transparency in laws and ease of doing business are prime factors to attract foreign investment. The government must acknowledge that. Hence, in order to boost the confidence of foreign investors and give a fillip to the Make in India initiative, it should accept the mistake, pay the wrongfully retained amount and move on. In future, it should desist from changing the goalposts after the match has started and refrain from introducing laws with retrospective effect.