oppn parties SC Collegium Recommends Record 68 Names For Judgeship

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
SC Collegium Recommends Record 68 Names For Judgeship

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2021-09-04 05:21:15

The Supreme Court collegium today recommended 68 names for judgeships in different high courts of the country. This is a welcome and much-needed development as the judicial system is groaning due to a backlog of cases which in turn are due to more than 50% vacancy in several high courts. Among the names passed are 44 senior advocates and 24 judicial officers. These names are for appointments in the HCs in Allahabad, Rajasthan, West Bengal, Jharkhand, Jammu and Kashmir, Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Punjab and Haryana, Kerala, Chhattisgarh and Assam.

This recommendation in one go assumes great importance as the previous collegium headed by former CJI S A Bobde could recommend only 46 names for nine HCs in its entire tenure of 18 months. Differences between the members of the previous collegium, comprising former CJI S A Bobde, Justice N V Ramana and Justice R F Nariman had led to an impasse. It is expected that the present collegium will speed up appointments if names are forwarded to it by high court collegiums.

It needs to be noted that there is a backlog of over 60 lakh cases in HCs. Most of the HCs are functioning well below their capacity. Hence, appointment of judges is vital. Further, the government is yet to take any decision in appointing retired judges on ad-hoc basis to clear the backlog even after the Supreme Court has decided to invoke Article 224A to facilitate such appointments. It has to be recognized that the backlog is huge and with the number of new cases being filed, is not likely to be cleared if the temporary measure of appointing ad-hoc judges is not taken. For the judicial system to dispense timely justice, it is necessary that the backlog is cleared and that is only possible if the HCs function at full strength and ad-hoc judges are appointed to help clear it speedily.