oppn parties SC Rightly Refuses To Tinker With Validity Period Of Cheques

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
SC Rightly Refuses To Tinker With Validity Period Of Cheques

By Ashwini Agarwal
First publised on 2020-07-11 15:10:14

The Supreme Court has done well not to accede to the demand for increasing the validity of cheques beyond three months. It took the plea that since the validity period was not fixed by any statute but was based on an RBI direction under the Banking Regulation Act, it was not proper to pass any order against it. The court also said that the RBI had also pleaded against any changes in the validity. Senior advocate V Giri, appearing for the RBI, informed the court that if the validity of cheques was changed, it would affect the banking system.

The banking system in India functions on core banking where the entire network of banks and almost all the branches have been networked and transactions take place in real-time. Banks in India use any one of the three software packages - Finacle by Infosys, BaNCS by TCS, Flexcube by Oracle - to maintain their accounts. All of them have been integrated with the core system. Each banking transaction gets a unique identification number once it is entered into the system by any branch. All these software packages and the main core banking system would need to be reoriented if the validity of cheques is extended beyond 90 days. It would throw the banking system out of gear for several days.

The pandemic has caused severe disruption in many sectors of the economy. But banking is one sector that has been running throughout the lockdown period, providing yeoman's service to all citizens. If processes are tinkered with due to small issues it will be disastrous. It will also set a bad precedent. Some other solution needs to be found for the problem being faced by the limit on the validity of cheques. The RBI must address this issue by giving suitable directions.