oppn parties Shameful And Deplorable Clash Between Lawyers and Police in Delhi

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Shameful And Deplorable Clash Between Lawyers and Police in Delhi

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Lawyers all over the country have always broken the very same law that they swear by and defend. In contravention of several Supreme Court orders that prevent them from striking work, lawyers in West Bengal went on a prolonged strike several months ago. Clashes between lawyers and the police are also common in the state. There have been reports of such striking of work and clashes from most other states too.

But what happened in Delhi was unprecedented, shameful and deplorable. A tiff between a police constable and a lawyer over a parking spot in the Tis Hazari court in the national capital snowballed into a full-scale war between officers of the court and those entrusted with the duty to uphold the rule of law. The fracas quickly became a violent clash where eight lawyers and twenty policemen were injured. Police and other vehicles were also torched. It did not stop at that. On later days, litigants, journalists and citizens, apart from policemen, were also beaten up by agitated lawyers.

This has resulted in a cycle of accusations and counter-accusations with protests and dharnas from both sides. No one from either side is concerned about the way decency and the maintenance of law and order have been thrown to the winds in this game of one-upmanship. The resultant chaos on the streets of the capital has undermined the system of justice in Delhi. Lawyers, in particular, have been more aggressive and have resorted to forcibly closing down court premises. The Bar Council has watched helplessly.

Ordinary citizens who have to attend court do so with a lot of fear. If they see lawyers and the police clashing the way they did, their fear will be magnified many times. They will be forced to think about how they can expect justice from a place where those entrusted with securing it for them are fighting among themselves. The instigators and perpetrators on both sides should be punished. The Bar Council must stop being a toothless body in these matters and must book the lawyers for indiscipline by suspending their right to practice (for a good length of time) for bringing disrepute to the profession. If such a provision is not there in its charter, it must be immediately adopted to drill some sense into lawyers.