oppn parties Should The Government Ban Fantasy Sport?

News Snippets

  • Sikh extremists attacked a cinema hall in London that was playing Kangana Ranaut's controversial film 'Emergency'
  • A Delhi court directed the investigating agencies to senstize officers to collect nail clippings, fingernail scrappings or finger swab in order to get DNA profile as direct evidence of sexual attack is often not present and might result in an offender going scot free
  • Uniform Civil Code rules cleared by state cabinet, likely to be implemented in the next 10 days
  • Supreme Court reiterates that there is no point in arresting the accused after the chargesheet has been filed and the investigation is complete
  • Kolkata court sentences Sanjoy Roy, the sole accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case, to life term. West Bengal government and CBI to appeal in HC for the death penalty
  • Supreme Court stays criminal defamation case against Rahul Gandhi for his remarks against home minister Amit Shah in Jharkhand during the AICC plenary session
  • Government reviews import basket to align it with the policies of the Trump administration
  • NCLT orders liquidation of GoAir airlines
  • Archery - Indian archers bagged 2 silver in Nimes Archery tournament in France
  • Stocks make impressive gain on Monday - Sensex adds 454 points to 77073 and Nifty 141 points to 23344
  • D Gukesh draws with Fabiano Caruana in the Tata Steel chess tournament in the Netherlands
  • Women's U-19 T20 WC - In a stunning game, debutants Nigeria beat New Zealand by 2 runs
  • Rohit Sharma to play under Ajinkye Rahane in Mumbai's Ranji match against J&K
  • Virat Kohli to play in Delhi's last group Ranji trophy match against Saurashtra. This will be his first Ranji match in 12 years
  • The toll in the Rajouri mystery illness case rose to 17 even as the Centre sent a team to study the situation
Calling the case not 'rarest of rare', a court in Kolkata sentenced Sanjay Roy, the only accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case to life in prison until death
oppn parties
Should The Government Ban Fantasy Sport?

By Slogger
First publised on 2021-01-08 10:19:54

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Holding an extreme view and carting the ball out of the park is what interests him most. He is a hard hitter at all times. Fasten your seatbelts and read.

Does fantasy sport, either for pure pleasure or even for money, fall in the realm of gambling or is it a game of skill? This question is being debated in government circles, the courts and even civil society as the sector sees phenomenal growth backed by huge investments. In fact, given the fact that the number of users have increased phenomenally in the last few years, India is fast becoming a hub for online fantasy sports with multiple channels providing games on multiple sports disciplines. From pure pleasure initially, the sector is now witnessing huge prize money being given out for those who apply their skills (or gamble, depending on one's point of view) to win. The dividing line between skill and gambling is not as thin as is being made out by those who oppose fantasy sport and even the courts, as well as the Niti Aayog, have acknowledged the importance of skill in such games.

The question before the government now is whether it should regulate such online fantasy sport channels or ban them. Given the fact that they have millions of users and the platforms themselves are multiplying at great speed, there seems to be a huge demand for such a channel. It asks 'players' to apply their skill based on the knowledge of the performance of sporting stars to form 'teams' and the person whose 'team' performs the best win the prize money. Others also win based on periodic assessments of such teams or performance of stars in their 'teams'. Even if there is an element of gambling involved, it fails due to the simple reason that there are millions of permutations and combinations and one can keep on changing the teams based on the recent performances of sportsmen. Hence, the element of skill, based on knowledge and calculations, overpowers the element of gambling to a large extent.

Hence, the government should not kill a channel that is developing so fast. Instead, it should regulate it to prevent unscrupulous promoters to take it down the gambling route (which they can do to earn money from unsuspecting users) and perhaps tax it appropriately to earn revenue. Since different states, and even different courts, are taking different views on the subject which are conflicting, it leads to confusion. It will also spook investors who will stop investing in the sector and the gains will be lost. The Centre must come out with a unified regulatory architecture which takes into account best practices in the world and ensures that the channels adhere to all laws and do not allow pure gambling to take place. The checks and balances in the framework would ensure that people employ skills to play the sport the promoters do not design games in a way that they become gambling platforms.