oppn parties Skewed Wealth Distribution: Whose Fault?

News Snippets

  • 2nd ODI: Rohit Sharma roars back to form with a scintillating ton as India beat England by 4 wickets in a high scoring match in Cuttack
  • Supreme Court will appoint an observer for the mayoral poll in Chandigarh
  • Government makes it compulsory for plastic carry bag makers to put a QR or barcode with their details on such bags
  • GBS outbreak in Pune leaves 73 ill with 14 on ventilator. GBS is a rare but treatable autoimmune disease
  • Madhya Pradesh government banned sale and consumption of liquor at 19 religious sites including Ujjain and Chitrakoot
  • Odisha emerges at the top in the fiscal health report of states while Haryana is at the bottom
  • JSW Steel net profit takes a massive hit of 70% in Q3
  • Tatas buy 60% stake in Pegatron, the contractor making iPhone's in India
  • Stocks return to negative zone - Sensex sheds 329 points to 76190 and Nifty loses 113 points to 23092
  • Bumrah, Jadeja and Yashasvi Jaiswal make the ICC Test team of the year even as no Indian found a place in the ODI squad
  • India take on England in the second T20 today at Chennai. They lead the 5-match series 1-0
  • Ravindra Jadeja excels in Ranji Trophy, takes 12 wickets in the match as Saurashtra beat Delhi by 10 wickets. All other Team India stars disappoint in the national tournament
  • Madhya Pradesh HC says collectors must not apply NSA "under political pressure and without application of mind"
  • Oxfam charged by CBI over violation of FCRA
  • Indian students in the US have started quitting part-time jobs (which are not legally allowed as per visa rules) over fears of deportation
Manipur Chief Minister Biren Singh resigns after meeting Home Minister Amit Shah and BJP chief J P Nadda /////// President's Rule likely in Manipur
oppn parties
Skewed Wealth Distribution: Whose Fault?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-01-24 08:39:42

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
Even as Narendra Modi represents India at the World Economic Forum in Davos – the first Indian prime minister to be there after H D Deve Gowda in 1997 – Rahul Gandhi, taking a cue from a report that pointed out that just 1 percent of Indians held 73 percent of the nation’s wealth, has asked Modi to explain that to the august gathering in Davos.

It is really very easy to explain that. For, this skewed amassing of wealth by a miniscule percentage of Indians has not occurred in the last three or four years. It has been allowed systematically by Congress governments of the past through their economic policies that encouraged protectionism and monopolies through the licence-quota raj on the one hand and allowed massive leakages in public welfare programmes to create crony capitalists who siphoned out mind-boggling funds meant for the poor, obviously with appropriate kickbacks for the ruling class. In the absence of competition and fair licensing system, people with money and connections kept cornering licenses and money continued to beget money. Even in the 2G scam, though corruption has not been proved, the courts have frowned at the way licenses were issued. Nepotism and favoritism have been the hallmark of the governing style of the Congress and this, more than anything else, has resulted in both the middleclass and the poor remaining where they were – even becoming worse in the face of rising inflation – while the rich continuing to get richer.

Although the dismantling of the barriers and reforms were also started during the Congress regime only, it was under P V Narashima Rao and not under a member of the Gandhi family. Since then, there has been a remarkable jump in talented people starting new and successful ventures, a luxury that was not available to them before the 1990’s. So, instead of needling the prime minister, Gandhi must study the economic history of India under the Congress before 1991. He will get all the answers why just 1 percent of Indians hold an absurd amount of the nation’s wealth.