oppn parties States Lose The Power To List OBCs

News Snippets

  • R G Kar rape-murder hearing start in Kolkata's Sealdah court on Monday
  • Calcutta HC rules that a person cannot be indicted for consensual sex after promise of marriage even if he reneges on that promise later
  • Cryptocurrencies jump after Trump's win, Bitcoin goes past $84K while Dogecoin jumps 50%
  • Vistara merges with Air India today
  • GST Council to decide on zero tax on term plans and select health covers in its Dec 21-22 meeting
  • SIP inflows stood at a record Rs 25323cr in October
  • Chess: Chennai GM tournament - Aravindh Chithambaram shares the top spot with two others
  • Asian Champions Trophy hockey for women: India thrash Malaysia 4-0
  • Batteries, chains and screws were among 65 objects found in the stomach of a 14-year-old Hathras boy who died after these objects were removed in a complex surgery at Delhi's Safdarjung Hospital
  • India confirms that 'verification patrolling' is on at Demchok and Depsang in Ladakh after disengagement of troops
  • LeT commander and 2 other terrorists killed in Srinagar in a gunbattle with security forces. 4 security personnel injured too.
  • Man arrested in Nagpur for sending hoax emails to the PMO in order to get his book published
  • Adani Power sets a deadline of November 7 for Bangladesh to clear its dues, failing which the company will stop supplying power to the nation
  • Shubman Gill (90) and Rishabh Pant (60) ensure India get a lead in the final Test after which Ashwin and Jadeja reduce the visitors to 171 for 9 in the second innings
  • Final Test versus New Zealand: Match evenly poised as NZ are 143 ahead with 1 wicket in hand
Security forces gun down 10 'armed militants' in Manipur's Jiribam district but locals say those killed were village volunteers and claim that 11, and not 10, were killed
oppn parties
States Lose The Power To List OBCs

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2021-05-06 13:04:49

The 102nd amendment to the Constitution had granted constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) and had allegedly altered the system of identifying OBCs. The usual practice was for two lists - Central and state - to exist simultaneously and states had the power to identify communities and classes that were socially and educationally backward (SEBC) to grant them the benefit of reservation. At the time the amendment was carried out, several opposition parties had raised objections that the wording of the law would take away the rights of the states. But the government, especially the social justice minister Thaawarchand Gehlot, had rubbished the claims and had said that it was just to grant constitutional status to the NCBC.

But the Supreme Court, in a landmark judgment that will have wide ramifications, upheld the validity of the 102nd amendment unanimously, although the judges differed on how it altered the system of identifying the OBCs. A majority of three judges said that henceforth, only the President (which effectively means the Centre as the President issues orders on the advice of the central Council of Ministers) will be able to take decisions on declaring SEBCs for granting reservation. This denudes the power of the states in this regard. Two judges differed and in a separate order said that the system of having two lists can continue and both the Centre and the states can have their own lists in this regard.

If the wording of the amendment is not corrected, states will now have to make recommendations to the Centre to include SEBCs identified by them. Since most states feel that each state has different classes that need to be identified as OBCs after studying the ground realities and the background, they feel that this order will take away an important tool from them to provide social justice to backward communities and classes. They have asked the Centre to study the SC order in detail and amend the 102nd amendment appropriately to restore their power.