oppn parties Supreme Court Advises Settlement Of Future-Amazon-Reliance Dispute

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Supreme Court Advises Settlement Of Future-Amazon-Reliance Dispute

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2022-03-04 03:18:59

In a surprising but excellent development, the Supreme Court warned Future Retail, Amazon and Reliance Retail that any judicial order in their ongoing dispute over the acquisition of Future Retail assets is likely to hurt one of the parties and suggested that they settle the dispute through negotiations. The parties agreed with alacrity. The court gave them 10 days and asked for a progress report by March 15.

The Future-Amazon-Reliance dispute has reached a stage where each of the parties is approaching the court for even the smallest of things. There are several court orders and it is not clear what can or cannot be done by a party without contravening one of them. The dispute is becoming intractable and can go on for ages if things continue like this. That would not be fair to Future Retail creditors.

The court is right that any final judicial order in the case is likely to hurt one of the parties. Hence, it will be better if all the parties sit together and work out a deal that is fair to all, including the creditors of Future Retail. For, Future wants to sell its assets mainly because it is unable to pay its dues. Banks are involved and they have already threatened to invoke IBC. If that happens, it will hurt Amazon as it has not matched Reliance's offer.

What should now happen is that Reliance and Amazon should bid (as suggested by the consortium of banks) for the assets of Future Retail. But the higher bid should take into account two things: one, the demand of the creditors of Future Retail and two, the financial interests of the losing party. Amazon claims its agreement with Future grants it the right of first refusal. It can be given that right to quote for the assets first. If that bid is low and not acceptable, it will stand to lose that right.

An honourable deal must be struck through negotiation that protects the interests of all parties, including the creditors of Future Retail. It is obvious that all parties will not be compensated in full. But since these are prized assets and Reliance has already offered Rs 24713cr (in August 2020) for them, a benchmark figure exists. It can be used to further modify the deal and make it better for all parties.