oppn parties Supreme Court Advises Settlement Of Future-Amazon-Reliance Dispute

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Supreme Court Advises Settlement Of Future-Amazon-Reliance Dispute

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2022-03-04 03:18:59

In a surprising but excellent development, the Supreme Court warned Future Retail, Amazon and Reliance Retail that any judicial order in their ongoing dispute over the acquisition of Future Retail assets is likely to hurt one of the parties and suggested that they settle the dispute through negotiations. The parties agreed with alacrity. The court gave them 10 days and asked for a progress report by March 15.

The Future-Amazon-Reliance dispute has reached a stage where each of the parties is approaching the court for even the smallest of things. There are several court orders and it is not clear what can or cannot be done by a party without contravening one of them. The dispute is becoming intractable and can go on for ages if things continue like this. That would not be fair to Future Retail creditors.

The court is right that any final judicial order in the case is likely to hurt one of the parties. Hence, it will be better if all the parties sit together and work out a deal that is fair to all, including the creditors of Future Retail. For, Future wants to sell its assets mainly because it is unable to pay its dues. Banks are involved and they have already threatened to invoke IBC. If that happens, it will hurt Amazon as it has not matched Reliance's offer.

What should now happen is that Reliance and Amazon should bid (as suggested by the consortium of banks) for the assets of Future Retail. But the higher bid should take into account two things: one, the demand of the creditors of Future Retail and two, the financial interests of the losing party. Amazon claims its agreement with Future grants it the right of first refusal. It can be given that right to quote for the assets first. If that bid is low and not acceptable, it will stand to lose that right.

An honourable deal must be struck through negotiation that protects the interests of all parties, including the creditors of Future Retail. It is obvious that all parties will not be compensated in full. But since these are prized assets and Reliance has already offered Rs 24713cr (in August 2020) for them, a benchmark figure exists. It can be used to further modify the deal and make it better for all parties.