oppn parties Supreme Court Advises Settlement Of Future-Amazon-Reliance Dispute

News Snippets

  • 2nd ODI: Rohit Sharma roars back to form with a scintillating ton as India beat England by 4 wickets in a high scoring match in Cuttack
  • Supreme Court will appoint an observer for the mayoral poll in Chandigarh
  • Government makes it compulsory for plastic carry bag makers to put a QR or barcode with their details on such bags
  • GBS outbreak in Pune leaves 73 ill with 14 on ventilator. GBS is a rare but treatable autoimmune disease
  • Madhya Pradesh government banned sale and consumption of liquor at 19 religious sites including Ujjain and Chitrakoot
  • Odisha emerges at the top in the fiscal health report of states while Haryana is at the bottom
  • JSW Steel net profit takes a massive hit of 70% in Q3
  • Tatas buy 60% stake in Pegatron, the contractor making iPhone's in India
  • Stocks return to negative zone - Sensex sheds 329 points to 76190 and Nifty loses 113 points to 23092
  • Bumrah, Jadeja and Yashasvi Jaiswal make the ICC Test team of the year even as no Indian found a place in the ODI squad
  • India take on England in the second T20 today at Chennai. They lead the 5-match series 1-0
  • Ravindra Jadeja excels in Ranji Trophy, takes 12 wickets in the match as Saurashtra beat Delhi by 10 wickets. All other Team India stars disappoint in the national tournament
  • Madhya Pradesh HC says collectors must not apply NSA "under political pressure and without application of mind"
  • Oxfam charged by CBI over violation of FCRA
  • Indian students in the US have started quitting part-time jobs (which are not legally allowed as per visa rules) over fears of deportation
Manipur Chief Minister Biren Singh resigns after meeting Home Minister Amit Shah and BJP chief J P Nadda /////// President's Rule likely in Manipur
oppn parties
Supreme Court Advises Settlement Of Future-Amazon-Reliance Dispute

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2022-03-04 03:18:59

In a surprising but excellent development, the Supreme Court warned Future Retail, Amazon and Reliance Retail that any judicial order in their ongoing dispute over the acquisition of Future Retail assets is likely to hurt one of the parties and suggested that they settle the dispute through negotiations. The parties agreed with alacrity. The court gave them 10 days and asked for a progress report by March 15.

The Future-Amazon-Reliance dispute has reached a stage where each of the parties is approaching the court for even the smallest of things. There are several court orders and it is not clear what can or cannot be done by a party without contravening one of them. The dispute is becoming intractable and can go on for ages if things continue like this. That would not be fair to Future Retail creditors.

The court is right that any final judicial order in the case is likely to hurt one of the parties. Hence, it will be better if all the parties sit together and work out a deal that is fair to all, including the creditors of Future Retail. For, Future wants to sell its assets mainly because it is unable to pay its dues. Banks are involved and they have already threatened to invoke IBC. If that happens, it will hurt Amazon as it has not matched Reliance's offer.

What should now happen is that Reliance and Amazon should bid (as suggested by the consortium of banks) for the assets of Future Retail. But the higher bid should take into account two things: one, the demand of the creditors of Future Retail and two, the financial interests of the losing party. Amazon claims its agreement with Future grants it the right of first refusal. It can be given that right to quote for the assets first. If that bid is low and not acceptable, it will stand to lose that right.

An honourable deal must be struck through negotiation that protects the interests of all parties, including the creditors of Future Retail. It is obvious that all parties will not be compensated in full. But since these are prized assets and Reliance has already offered Rs 24713cr (in August 2020) for them, a benchmark figure exists. It can be used to further modify the deal and make it better for all parties.