oppn parties Supreme Court's Lesson On The Powers Of A Governor

News Snippets

  • Rajasthan Police arrest Md Riyaz Akhtari and Gaus Mohammed for beheading the tailor in Udaipur
  • Curfew imposed in 7 police station areas in Udaipur and internet services suspended across Rajasthan as a tailor is beheaded in Udaipur for his social media post in support of Nupur Sharma
  • West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee says the state will not give preference to Agniveers as it will clean "BJP's dustbin"
  • Enforcement Directorate asks Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut to appear before it on Friday
  • Devendra Fadnavis meets Amit Shah, discusses tie-up with Shinde
  • Rebels reject Uddhav Thackeray's emotional appeal to come and discuss the issues
  • BJP wants MVA government to face floor test, petitions the government on the same
  • Rupee hits a new low of 78.84 against the dollar, might breach the 79 mark
  • Hotel rooms below Rs 1000 and unbranded packed food to be brought under GST
  • Pallonji Mistry, the head of the Shapoorji Pallonji group, dies at 93. He was the single largest shareholder of Tata Sons with a 18.4% stake
  • India just about manage to beat a rampaging Ireland as the latter make a valiant attempt to chase down India's mammoth score of 225 in the second and final T20. India won by 4 runs
  • Experts believe that the time granted by the Supreme Court to rebel MLAs paves the way for holding a floor test in the Maharashtra assembly
  • Uddhav Thackeray strips rebel ministers of portfolios but stops short of sacking them
  • PM Modi says that energy access should not be limited to rich nations
  • BJP says it is ready with a plan and a new government in Maharashtra may be sworn in by Sunday
Uddhav Thackeray resigns as Supreme Court does not provide relief /////// Jasprit Bumrah to lead India in the 5th Test against England as Rohit Sharma ruled out due to Covid
oppn parties
Supreme Court's Lesson On The Powers Of A Governor

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-05-19 07:36:02

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

In India's federal structure, the governor is a constitutional head who is bound by the aid and advice of the elected state government. But in reality, the role of the governor is increasingly being questioned as they are being viewed as 'agents' of the Central government who try and impede the working of the state government by 'misusing' their powers. The Supreme Court has, in the A G Perarivalan judgment, called the governor "but a shorthand expression for the state government" and had said that "the advice of the state cabinet is binding on the governor in matter relating to commutation/remission of sentences under Article 161".

The court also took a stern view of the "non-exercise of power or inextricable delay in exercise of power" by the governor and categorically stated that such delays on taking a decision in such matters make them amenable to judicial review. Since the governor reports to the Centre, the role of the Central government is also under the cloud in such matters as in the instant case, the Centre was resisting the state government's decision to release the convicts held for assassinating former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi. It could be held that the governor was not taking any action on the state government’s advice as he was directed not to do so by the Central government.

The judgment is clear on these points. It has clearly said that the governor was at fault for not acting on the state cabinet's advice made for remission under the powers granted to it under Article 161. It also faulted the governor for referring the same to the President as there is no provision in the Constitution for the governor to make such a reference.

There can be some genuine disputes between the Centre and the states on the reading of the law but when something is as crystal clear as the powers of the state government under Article 161, the federal structure is weakened if the Centre, through the governor, tries to put hurdles in the implementation of the decisions taken by an elected government in the state. Hopefully, the present judgment ensure that governors act as per law and without delay.