oppn parties Waters Are Being Tested For Starting Temple Politics Again

News Snippets

  • 2nd ODI: Rohit Sharma roars back to form with a scintillating ton as India beat England by 4 wickets in a high scoring match in Cuttack
  • Supreme Court will appoint an observer for the mayoral poll in Chandigarh
  • Government makes it compulsory for plastic carry bag makers to put a QR or barcode with their details on such bags
  • GBS outbreak in Pune leaves 73 ill with 14 on ventilator. GBS is a rare but treatable autoimmune disease
  • Madhya Pradesh government banned sale and consumption of liquor at 19 religious sites including Ujjain and Chitrakoot
  • Odisha emerges at the top in the fiscal health report of states while Haryana is at the bottom
  • JSW Steel net profit takes a massive hit of 70% in Q3
  • Tatas buy 60% stake in Pegatron, the contractor making iPhone's in India
  • Stocks return to negative zone - Sensex sheds 329 points to 76190 and Nifty loses 113 points to 23092
  • Bumrah, Jadeja and Yashasvi Jaiswal make the ICC Test team of the year even as no Indian found a place in the ODI squad
  • India take on England in the second T20 today at Chennai. They lead the 5-match series 1-0
  • Ravindra Jadeja excels in Ranji Trophy, takes 12 wickets in the match as Saurashtra beat Delhi by 10 wickets. All other Team India stars disappoint in the national tournament
  • Madhya Pradesh HC says collectors must not apply NSA "under political pressure and without application of mind"
  • Oxfam charged by CBI over violation of FCRA
  • Indian students in the US have started quitting part-time jobs (which are not legally allowed as per visa rules) over fears of deportation
Manipur Chief Minister Biren Singh resigns after meeting Home Minister Amit Shah and BJP chief J P Nadda /////// President's Rule likely in Manipur
oppn parties
Waters Are Being Tested For Starting Temple Politics Again

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-04-12 07:07:49

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

Four developments that took place recently do not augur well for the preservation of our historical religious places and for peace among Hindus and Muslims. In one of these developments, a junior magistrate in Mathura rightly chose not to entertain a petition that sought to examine whether the mosque that stood in the town at a place that is known as Krishna Janmbhoomi was constructed by demolishing a temple, saying that the petitioner had no locus standi in the matter. In a second development, the Allahabad High Court reserved its judgment on the maintainability of a petition that sought to examine the status of the mosque that stood adjacent to the Kashi Viswanath Temple in Varanasi. In a third development, the Supreme Court admitted a petition that sought to challenge The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 and issued notice to the Centre. In the fourth and most alarming development, a civil court in Varanasi has ordered the Archaeological Survey of India to survey the Gyanvapi mosque in order to find out whether it stood on the ruins of a Hindu temple. It is surprising that despite The Places of Worship Act having expressly frozen the status of religious places to as they existed on 15th August 1947 the Varanasi judge chose to pass the above order.

The above developments show that the slogan "Ayodhya toh jhanki hai, Mathura, Kashi baki hai" was not coined just for effect - the votaries of Hindutva, and those bent on erasing a part of Indian history, will not pay heed to The Places of Worship Act and will do all it takes to arouse passions over Mathura and Kashi. What is now clear is that despite getting a favourable verdict from the Supreme Court in the Ayodhya case (or may be because of it), the Hindutva elements will not let go of temple politics and use it to create further divisions in society. It helps their cause that the BJP is now ruling at the Centre and in UP. What will now be watched with interest is the Centre's response to the notice the Supreme Court has issued to it over the challenge to The Places of Worship Act. If the Centre chooses to defend the Act, then it will send a signal to the elements who file such applications to desist from doing so. In any other scenario, more such applications will be filed creating a legal tussle. It will become very difficult to send the genie back in the bottle once it is allowed to come out.