oppn parties Waters Are Being Tested For Starting Temple Politics Again

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Waters Are Being Tested For Starting Temple Politics Again

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-04-12 07:07:49

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Four developments that took place recently do not augur well for the preservation of our historical religious places and for peace among Hindus and Muslims. In one of these developments, a junior magistrate in Mathura rightly chose not to entertain a petition that sought to examine whether the mosque that stood in the town at a place that is known as Krishna Janmbhoomi was constructed by demolishing a temple, saying that the petitioner had no locus standi in the matter. In a second development, the Allahabad High Court reserved its judgment on the maintainability of a petition that sought to examine the status of the mosque that stood adjacent to the Kashi Viswanath Temple in Varanasi. In a third development, the Supreme Court admitted a petition that sought to challenge The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 and issued notice to the Centre. In the fourth and most alarming development, a civil court in Varanasi has ordered the Archaeological Survey of India to survey the Gyanvapi mosque in order to find out whether it stood on the ruins of a Hindu temple. It is surprising that despite The Places of Worship Act having expressly frozen the status of religious places to as they existed on 15th August 1947 the Varanasi judge chose to pass the above order.

The above developments show that the slogan "Ayodhya toh jhanki hai, Mathura, Kashi baki hai" was not coined just for effect - the votaries of Hindutva, and those bent on erasing a part of Indian history, will not pay heed to The Places of Worship Act and will do all it takes to arouse passions over Mathura and Kashi. What is now clear is that despite getting a favourable verdict from the Supreme Court in the Ayodhya case (or may be because of it), the Hindutva elements will not let go of temple politics and use it to create further divisions in society. It helps their cause that the BJP is now ruling at the Centre and in UP. What will now be watched with interest is the Centre's response to the notice the Supreme Court has issued to it over the challenge to The Places of Worship Act. If the Centre chooses to defend the Act, then it will send a signal to the elements who file such applications to desist from doing so. In any other scenario, more such applications will be filed creating a legal tussle. It will become very difficult to send the genie back in the bottle once it is allowed to come out.