oppn parties Who Will Prevent Criminals From Contesting Elections?

News Snippets

  • PM Modi tells BJP workers that India is in for a long battle against the coronavirus and there is no scope to feel tired or defeated
  • PM Modi asks ministers to focus on exports and new areas and sectors
  • PM Modi asks ministers to prepare business continuity plan post the lifting of the lockdown
  • Corona cases in India cross 4000 and the death toll stands at 124
  • The government decides to double the testing of corona suspects from 10000 now to 20000 in the next three days
  • Flipkart assures employees that there will be no job or salary cuts due to the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Although it was obvious, but the government still clarifies that there is no need to switch off appliances and only lights need to be switched off on April 5 at 9pm after confusion in the minds of some people
  • PM Modi and President Trump decide "to deploy full strength of (Indo-US) partnership" to fight against COVID-19
  • 17 states have reported 1023 cases of coronavirus linked to the Tablighi Jamaat, which translates to 30% of all positive cases in India
  • The government says people should not use alcohol-based hand sanitizers before lighting diyas or candles on April 5
  • The railways say there is no certainty yet when services will resume after the lockdown and a final decision will be taken in the next few days
  • As coronavirus cases multiply in Assam, six north-east states seal their borders with the state
  • Power System Operation Corporation Ltd. (POCOSO) putting all systems and protocols in place at war-footing to ensure there is no grid failure due to reduction in demand on April 5 at 9 pm
  • Power ministry scotches rumours that the power grid might fail due to the 9-minute blackout called by PM Modi on Sunday, April 5
  • Centre asks people to wear home-made masks if it is absolutely essential for them to step out of homes
26 nurses and 3 doctors test positive for COVID-19 at Wockhardt Hospital in Mumbai, facility cordoned off, no entry or exit permitted from the hospital
oppn parties
Who Will Prevent Criminals From Contesting Elections?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-01-28 18:18:39

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

The Supreme Court has admitted a plea by the Election Commission of India to examine whether a directive could be issued to all political parties in India to refrain from fielding candidates with criminal records in any elections. Although pinning a criminal record on politicians is tricky as they are charged (and sometimes convicted) with various crimes like unlawful assembly and sedition, apart from defamation, when they are in the opposition, there is a need to prevent those who have a record of more serious crimes from contesting elections.

But will a directive from the Supreme Court be enough to rid the Indian democracy of this ill? Unless Parliament amends the Representation of People's Act, 1951 (and related laws) people with criminal records cannot legally be prevented from being candidates in an election. But can the people expect anything from the current Lok Sabha in which more than 46% of the MPs have a criminal record and 29% have that for crimes of very serious nature? And who will bell the cat? Every political party in India is guilty of fielding such candidates, only the percentage varies.

This is a direct result of the fact that money and muscle have taken over the electoral system in India. Despite pontificating on the ill effects of both, no leader has the sagacity to bring in amendments to rectify the situation. Rajiv Gandhi had a brute majority in 1984 and talked about ridding the Congress of "power brokers" but nothing came out of it. Narendra Modi has an overwhelming majority now and can bring about a change but the government has shown it is not interested in doing so by introducing the opaque electoral bonds and the BJP fielding the highest number of candidates with criminal records.

A more serious question is why do people support such candidates? If a person has a criminal record, it is obvious that people in his or her area of operation know about it. Then why do they support such bahubalis? The first and obvious answer is due to fear. Then there is a matter of choosing the lesser evil as maybe all the candidates in the constituency have criminal records. The people also think someone who is powerful, regardless of being a criminal, will get their work done. They also vote for such candidates if he is put up by the party they support.

Hence, it can be forcefully argued that if parties do not field tainted candidates, people will not be forced to vote for them. But that is unlikely to happen in the present scenario. All parties need money and muscle to run a campaign and they are more likely to lean towards criminals who can provide both money and muscle than ideologues who can only provide ideas and speeches. It is a matter of commerce and political parties increasingly resemble unethical and greedy corporations in this respect. The Supreme Court had in the past issued many directives to clean up the electoral system. They have failed to work in the absence of a political will. All parties stand guilty of colluding to maintain the status quo in this respect.  

In fact, the NDA government had vehemently opposed a suggestion made by the Supreme Court in 2018 to give registration to political parties only if they did not field tainted candidates. The government had argued that it was not for the judiciary to decide on such matters as it was the exclusive domain of parliament. A five-judge bench of the court was hearing several pleas that sought to bar such candidates from contesting elections. The court had found merit in the suggestion by senior advocate Krishnan Venugopal that it issue a mandamus to the EC in this regard. The court had then agreed that it indeed did not have the power to ask parliament to enact a law on the subject but could issue a directive to the EC to prevent such persons from entering public life. Since the present plea is by the EC itself, it will be keenly watched how the government responds and how the court decides on the matter now.