oppn parties Why Go After Critical Voices In The Media?

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Why Go After Critical Voices In The Media?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-08-09 22:18:56

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
The government must take note of the concern raised by the Editor’s Guild of India regarding the resignations of several senior journalists from a few channels and blackouts happening in signals of certain channels during the airing of programmes that are critical of the government. This comes after several journalists who have criticized the NDA government have been trolled in the most threatening and abusing language on social media and one senior journalist has even been stalked and threatened on the streets of Delhi. All this cannot be by coincidence and there is a pattern in these incidents.

No one is saying that the government is doing it. But by not acting against those who are doing it, the government cannot absolve itself of complicity. There are several ways by which the government can put pressure on the media to stifle criticism of its policies. Many of these ways are covert. One news channel has been bearing the brunt of government machinery. But the government must realize that the media is the fourth pillar of democracy and the journalists are just doing their job. The government has the right to present its point of view and it is normally carried by the media. After that, the government must accept that commentators also have the right to present their points of view and they might differ from what the government thinks.

The relationship between an elected government and the media has always been uneasy, to say the least. As there are a thousand points of view in politics, so also there are a million ways the media analyses government policies and decisions. The government cannot expect all analysis to be favourable. The same policy can seem to be chalk to one commentator and cheese to another. It is a matter of ideology and thinking. But democracy can thrive and bubble only when a million views are presented before the citizens and open debate is encouraged. If voices critical of the ruling dispensation are stifled, we will become a nation of morons. Even more than freedom of speech, it is the citizen’s right of freedom of gaining knowledge that is being trampled upon.

Every citizen has the right of be informed about how government policy will impact the nation and her or him personally. The government explains its policies by giving one side of the picture. It is natural for the government to say all good things about any policy decision for otherwise it would not have decided to implement it. But the citizen has a right to know if there is any downside to the policy. It is here where the role of media is indispensible. There are millions of experts in the country and around the world who will analyze the policy threadbare and will present both the good and the bad things about it. These experts write for the media or take part in debates that are aired to inform the people. Wishing for the media to write or air only the views that are favourable to the government or eulogize the leadership is the worst kind of megalomania and doesn’t befit an elected government in a democratic country.