oppn parties Why Go After Critical Voices In The Media?

News Snippets

  • The home ministry has notified 50% constable-level jobs in BSF for direct recruitment for ex-Agniveers
  • Supreme Court said that if an accused or even a convict obtains a NOC from the concerned court with the rider that permission would be needed to go abroad, the government cannot obstruct renewal of their passport
  • Supreme Court said that criminal record and gravity of offence play a big part in bail decisions while quashing the bail of 5 habitual offenders
  • PM Modi visits Bengal, fails to holds a rally in Matua heartland of Nadia after dense fog prevents landing of his helicopter but addresses the crowd virtually from Kolkata aiprort
  • Government firm on sim-linking for web access to messaging apps, but may increase the auto logout time from 6 hours to 12-18 hours
  • Mizoram-New Delhi Rajdhani Express hits an elephant herd in Assam, killing seven elephants including four calves
  • Indian women take on Sri Lanka is the first match of the T20 series at Visakhapatnam today
  • U19 Asia Cup: India take on Pakistan today for the crown
  • In a surprisng move, the selectors dropped Shubman Gill from the T20 World Cup squad and made Axar Patel the vice-captain. Jitesh Sharma was also dropped to make way for Ishan Kishan as he was performing well and Rinku Singh earned a spot for his finishing abilities
  • Opposition parties, chiefly the Congress and TMC, say that changing the name of the rural employment guarantee scheme is an insult to the memory of Mahatma Gandhi
  • Commerce secreatary Rajesh Agarwal said that the latest data shows that exporters are diversifying
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that if India were a 'dead economy' as claimed by opposition parties, India's rating would not have been upgraded
  • The Insurance Bill, to be tabled in Parliament, will give more teeth to the regulator and allow 100% FDI
  • Nitin Nabin took charge as the national working president of the BJP
  • Division in opposition ranks as J&K chief minister Omar Abdullah distances the INDIA bloc from vote chori and SIR pitch of the Congress
U19 World Cup - Pakistan thrash India by 192 runs ////// Shubman Gill dropped from T20 World Cup squad, Axar Patel replaces him as vice-captain
oppn parties
Why Go After Critical Voices In The Media?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-08-09 22:18:56

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
The government must take note of the concern raised by the Editor’s Guild of India regarding the resignations of several senior journalists from a few channels and blackouts happening in signals of certain channels during the airing of programmes that are critical of the government. This comes after several journalists who have criticized the NDA government have been trolled in the most threatening and abusing language on social media and one senior journalist has even been stalked and threatened on the streets of Delhi. All this cannot be by coincidence and there is a pattern in these incidents.

No one is saying that the government is doing it. But by not acting against those who are doing it, the government cannot absolve itself of complicity. There are several ways by which the government can put pressure on the media to stifle criticism of its policies. Many of these ways are covert. One news channel has been bearing the brunt of government machinery. But the government must realize that the media is the fourth pillar of democracy and the journalists are just doing their job. The government has the right to present its point of view and it is normally carried by the media. After that, the government must accept that commentators also have the right to present their points of view and they might differ from what the government thinks.

The relationship between an elected government and the media has always been uneasy, to say the least. As there are a thousand points of view in politics, so also there are a million ways the media analyses government policies and decisions. The government cannot expect all analysis to be favourable. The same policy can seem to be chalk to one commentator and cheese to another. It is a matter of ideology and thinking. But democracy can thrive and bubble only when a million views are presented before the citizens and open debate is encouraged. If voices critical of the ruling dispensation are stifled, we will become a nation of morons. Even more than freedom of speech, it is the citizen’s right of freedom of gaining knowledge that is being trampled upon.

Every citizen has the right of be informed about how government policy will impact the nation and her or him personally. The government explains its policies by giving one side of the picture. It is natural for the government to say all good things about any policy decision for otherwise it would not have decided to implement it. But the citizen has a right to know if there is any downside to the policy. It is here where the role of media is indispensible. There are millions of experts in the country and around the world who will analyze the policy threadbare and will present both the good and the bad things about it. These experts write for the media or take part in debates that are aired to inform the people. Wishing for the media to write or air only the views that are favourable to the government or eulogize the leadership is the worst kind of megalomania and doesn’t befit an elected government in a democratic country.