oppn parties Why Go After Critical Voices In The Media?

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Why Go After Critical Voices In The Media?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-08-09 22:18:56

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
The government must take note of the concern raised by the Editor’s Guild of India regarding the resignations of several senior journalists from a few channels and blackouts happening in signals of certain channels during the airing of programmes that are critical of the government. This comes after several journalists who have criticized the NDA government have been trolled in the most threatening and abusing language on social media and one senior journalist has even been stalked and threatened on the streets of Delhi. All this cannot be by coincidence and there is a pattern in these incidents.

No one is saying that the government is doing it. But by not acting against those who are doing it, the government cannot absolve itself of complicity. There are several ways by which the government can put pressure on the media to stifle criticism of its policies. Many of these ways are covert. One news channel has been bearing the brunt of government machinery. But the government must realize that the media is the fourth pillar of democracy and the journalists are just doing their job. The government has the right to present its point of view and it is normally carried by the media. After that, the government must accept that commentators also have the right to present their points of view and they might differ from what the government thinks.

The relationship between an elected government and the media has always been uneasy, to say the least. As there are a thousand points of view in politics, so also there are a million ways the media analyses government policies and decisions. The government cannot expect all analysis to be favourable. The same policy can seem to be chalk to one commentator and cheese to another. It is a matter of ideology and thinking. But democracy can thrive and bubble only when a million views are presented before the citizens and open debate is encouraged. If voices critical of the ruling dispensation are stifled, we will become a nation of morons. Even more than freedom of speech, it is the citizen’s right of freedom of gaining knowledge that is being trampled upon.

Every citizen has the right of be informed about how government policy will impact the nation and her or him personally. The government explains its policies by giving one side of the picture. It is natural for the government to say all good things about any policy decision for otherwise it would not have decided to implement it. But the citizen has a right to know if there is any downside to the policy. It is here where the role of media is indispensible. There are millions of experts in the country and around the world who will analyze the policy threadbare and will present both the good and the bad things about it. These experts write for the media or take part in debates that are aired to inform the people. Wishing for the media to write or air only the views that are favourable to the government or eulogize the leadership is the worst kind of megalomania and doesn’t befit an elected government in a democratic country.