oppn parties Why It Took So Long And Why Were There So Many Twists & Turns?

News Snippets

  • Calcutta HC says Cricket Association of Bengal is not liable to pay tax on advertisement inisde Eden Gardens cricket ground as it is not a 'public place' because it does not have unrestricted access for the general public
  • Supreme Court admits a plea from a child of a single OBC mother who had applied for an OBC certificate for her son
  • Supreme Court approves applying strict preventive detention laws for 'cybercriminals'
  • SBI likely to shift part of operations of its Global Market Unit from Kolkata to Mumbai
  • FM nirmala Sitharaman calls for a "structured, process-driven approach to compliance" and asks top I-T officials to speed up refunds and simplify processes
  • Marine insurance costs surge as the oil corridor in Strait of Homruz becomes risky due to war
  • Stocks weaken on Monday on global cues: sensex sheds 511 points to 81896 and Nifty 140 points to 24971
  • Former left-arm spinner Dilip Doshi dies in London at 77. He played for India in 33 Test matches and for Bengal in domestic tournaments
  • Pant becomes the only keeper to score two centuries in the same Test in England
  • England Test: Rishabh Pant hits his second ton and KL Rahul a classy century to put India on top, England need 350 runs on the last day, with the ptich showing signs of wear and tear
  • DGCA orders an audit of the entire aviation ecosystem in the wake of recent snags in many flights after the AI Dreamliner crash in Ahmedabad
  • 2 Pahalgam residents arrested by NIA for sheltering and aiding 3 terrorists who killed civilian tourists in pahalgam tell the agency that there were 3 LeT ultras from Pakistan that carried out the attack
  • India unlikely to agree to US demands for lower tariffs on agri products and GM food, trade deal faces fresh hurdles
  • Stocks likely to plummet today as traders will be worried about the effect of US strike on iran, oil price rise and possible inflation. Foreign funds may also withdraw in the volatile global situation
  • Oil prices likely to shoot up as US strikes at iran and the latter decides to close the Strait of Homruz
Rishabh Pant hits second century of the match, becomes only wicketkeeper to hit two tons in the same Test in England ////// England need 350 runs to win in 90 overs on the final day
oppn parties
Why It Took So Long And Why Were There So Many Twists & Turns?

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2024-04-12 14:31:12

What happens when courts reverse earlier decisions, including an arbitral award, multiple times? Ease of doing business and the confidence of companies in policies and rule of law goes for a toss. Valuable time is lost and capital remains blocked. This is what happened in the case between government-owned public utility Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) and Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL), a Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary owned by Anil Ambani. In 2008, DAMEPL had entered into an agreement with DMRC to develop the Airport Express line for the Delhi Metro. Due to some differences over curing of defects, DAMEPL terminated the agreement, forcing DMRC to invoke the arbitration clause in 2012. The arbitration panel voted in favour of DAMEPL in 2017. DMRC approached the Delhi HC which upheld the award. But on appeal, a division bench of the same court set it aside. The matter reached the Supreme Court and in 2021, the apex court reversed the Delhi HC division bench order to uphold the arbitral award and ordered DMRC to pay Rs 2782.3cr plus interest till the date of payment (which now stands at nearly Rs 8000cr) to DAMEPL. Now, the Supreme Court has set aside its 2021 order and DMRC is not to pay anything to DAMEPL.

In reversing its earlier decision, the apex court was of the view that there was a "miscarriage of justice" in the earlier order and it "erred in interfering with the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court". This, the court said, had resulted in saddling a "public utility with an exorbitant liability". It also said that the Delhi HC division bench was right in holding that the award was "perverse, irrational and patently illegal" and had "overlooked crucial facts and evidence on record".

Although the latest order will be music to the ears of the DMRC management and rights a blatant wrong which could have resulted in a private company getting "undeserved windfall", the case holds many lessons for policy makers and regulators and even the judiciary. It took too long to arrive at a closure - such cases should be decided faster and if the courts are pressed for time, there is an urgent need for an independent regulator for such cases.