oppn parties Why It Took So Long And Why Were There So Many Twists & Turns?

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Why It Took So Long And Why Were There So Many Twists & Turns?

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2024-04-12 14:31:12

What happens when courts reverse earlier decisions, including an arbitral award, multiple times? Ease of doing business and the confidence of companies in policies and rule of law goes for a toss. Valuable time is lost and capital remains blocked. This is what happened in the case between government-owned public utility Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) and Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL), a Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary owned by Anil Ambani. In 2008, DAMEPL had entered into an agreement with DMRC to develop the Airport Express line for the Delhi Metro. Due to some differences over curing of defects, DAMEPL terminated the agreement, forcing DMRC to invoke the arbitration clause in 2012. The arbitration panel voted in favour of DAMEPL in 2017. DMRC approached the Delhi HC which upheld the award. But on appeal, a division bench of the same court set it aside. The matter reached the Supreme Court and in 2021, the apex court reversed the Delhi HC division bench order to uphold the arbitral award and ordered DMRC to pay Rs 2782.3cr plus interest till the date of payment (which now stands at nearly Rs 8000cr) to DAMEPL. Now, the Supreme Court has set aside its 2021 order and DMRC is not to pay anything to DAMEPL.

In reversing its earlier decision, the apex court was of the view that there was a "miscarriage of justice" in the earlier order and it "erred in interfering with the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court". This, the court said, had resulted in saddling a "public utility with an exorbitant liability". It also said that the Delhi HC division bench was right in holding that the award was "perverse, irrational and patently illegal" and had "overlooked crucial facts and evidence on record".

Although the latest order will be music to the ears of the DMRC management and rights a blatant wrong which could have resulted in a private company getting "undeserved windfall", the case holds many lessons for policy makers and regulators and even the judiciary. It took too long to arrive at a closure - such cases should be decided faster and if the courts are pressed for time, there is an urgent need for an independent regulator for such cases.