By Linus Garg
First publised on 2026-10-02 05:37:30
India has not moved forward since Hangzhou. It has moved backward and is calling it a good effort.
The Times of India's article today by Sabi Hussain on the Aichi-Nagoya Games sets out the record. India won 28 golds in 2023, and by Thursday it had lost 20 of those titles. The medal tally has passed 60, against 106 last time. The report also notes that the nine individual golds from Hangzhou, spread across shooting, athletics and archery, had not been defended. These are the events decided by one athlete and the clock, with no teammate to share the burden. India has lost its grip on exactly those.
The ten golds India does hold tell a narrower story. Nine of them came in team, relay or mixed events. One came from an individual athlete, Neeru Dhanda in women's trap. A country with the ambitions India announces should not depend so heavily on formats where a single strong squad can carry the result. Depth in individual sport is what separates a power from a participant, and the numbers show India is thin there.
The reaction is the second failure. Defending squash champions returned with a bronze. A wrestling silver was celebrated because India had waited since 1962 for one. Tennis returned without a medal for the first time since 1986. In each case the coverage found a reason for comfort. A nation that measures itself against its own low points will always find a small win to cheer. It will never find the reason it is falling behind.
The hockey semifinal shows the habit clearly. India built a 3-0 lead over Pakistan, let them claw back, and won 4-3 with seconds left. The result is a place in the final, and that deserves credit. But a champion that nearly throws away a three-goal lead has a problem that the scoreline hides. Relief is not the same as dominance, and the post-match mood confused the two.
Other Asian powers will read these results as an opening. Their programmes plan across years, treat the Asiad as part of a longer preparation, and do not stop to celebrate a single podium. India's athletes often do remarkable things in spite of the structure around them. The question to put to the federations is why the structure produces so few repeat champions. Who selected the squads, who decided the funding, and who answers when a defending gold medallist does not reach a final? Those answers should be on the record, with names and dates.
India's talent is not the issue. Its tolerance for mediocrity is. A system that is never held to account will keep producing the same result and the same explanation. Each time, the public will be told that progress is under way. The medal table says otherwise.
Read the Times of India article
After this article was written, four more individual gold medals were won in brilliant performances by Lovlina Borgohain (75kg), Parveen Hooda (65 kg) and Ankush Panghal (80 kg) in boxing and Sujeet Kalkal (65kg) in men's freestyle wrestling










