oppn parties All Lending Decisions Cannot Be Put Under The Scanner

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
All Lending Decisions Cannot Be Put Under The Scanner

By Ashwini Agarwal
First publised on 2022-01-11 05:19:53

The decision of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) to amend rules to minimize CBI intervention in alleged bank fraud cases is welcome. Specifically, the CVC has said that an expert panel will recommend whether a CBI inquiry is required in bad loans above Rs 3cr (previously Rs 50cr).

Any transaction where money is lent by a bank to a customer is always open to charges of corruption and kickbacks. In many high profile cases this has actually happened. But most loan transactions are through informed decisions by bankers who look at the customer profile, credit ranking, worth of project submitted, past record of loans to similar projects, future prospects of the project and, of course, government policy, among other things, to grant the loan. It is a many layered process and involves various departments of the bank.

Thus, when a loan goes bad, it is not correct to approach the issue as something that involves corruption. There are a host of factors that can turn a loan bad. But such is the buzz around bad loans now that bank officials are easy target. This is taking a huge toll on the economy as banks turn risk averse despite being flush with funds.

The government must reduce the trust deficit and the CVC decision is a good step in that direction. Bankers have also asked it to have a 'sunset' period for investigations, subject to conditions. This is also something that can be looked into. The government will have to create a system where bankers can lend to industry without the sword of an extra regulatory layer in the form of investigating agencies questioning their motives hangs over their necks.

Since the government has declared its intension of remaining in the financial sector and since PSBs will continue to remain the backbone of financing to industry, the earlier this issue is resolved the better for the economy. Otherwise, we will continue to have situations where despite being flush with funds, banks will not lend by simply saying that quality projects are not coming up. That is just a cover as they cannot openly say that they are afraid their decisions will be questioned later.