oppn parties Assessee Not Responsible For Ensuring TDS Is Paid To The Government: Delhi HC

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Assessee Not Responsible For Ensuring TDS Is Paid To The Government: Delhi HC

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2024-10-29 11:37:36

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Wrong Approach

The approach taken by tax authorities to recover Income Tax dues has become deeply troubling, especially when they ignore established laws and regulations by pursuing dues from the wrong parties. When tax is deducted at source from an employee's salary, the responsibility for paying that tax to the government rests solely with the employer. As per Section 205 of the Income Tax Act, once tax has been deducted from an individual's salary (or any other mandatory source), the taxpayer cannot be asked to pay the tax again unless there is a shortfall in the overall tax assessed on their total income.

Delhi HC To The Rescue

In a recent case, the Delhi High Court rightly ruled that a demand notice issued by the Income Tax department to a former pilot of the defunct Kingfisher Airlines had no legal foundation and should be rescinded. Since Kingfisher Airlines deducted the tax from the pilot's salary, it was the company's duty - not the pilot's - to remit it to the government. If the company failed to do so, the tax authorities should address the company directly to recover the dues, as the tax obligation on the pilot was already discharged at the time of deduction.

Bar Under Sec 205 Of I-T Act 

The Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) mechanism was established to ensure tax is collected from income at the point it becomes due. This system serves two primary purposes: to compel the reporting of income and to guarantee that tax is recovered at source. Under the law, it is the duty of the income provider to deduct TDS and deposit it with the government, using the payee's PAN. Once TDS has been deducted, the taxpayer has no further responsibility for remitting that tax to the government. Sec 205 of the I-T Act bars the I-T authorities from calling upon the assessee to pay the tax himself to the extent to which tax has been deducted from that income. In fact, if there is any refund that has to be claimed, the taxpayer becomes an aggrieved party because if the company does not remit the tax to the I-T department, they will not process the refund.

Stop Harassing The Taxpayers

By issuing notices demanding tax from individuals who have already had it deducted from their income, the Income Tax department is effectively asking them to pay twice on the same income - a violation of legal principles. The department should instead focus on holding accountable those companies that deduct TDS but fail to deposit it. Such misdirected recovery efforts constitute undue harassment of taxpayers and must come to an end.