oppn parties Assessee Not Responsible For Ensuring TDS Is Paid To The Government: Delhi HC

News Snippets

  • Sikh extremists attacked a cinema hall in London that was playing Kangana Ranaut's controversial film 'Emergency'
  • A Delhi court directed the investigating agencies to senstize officers to collect nail clippings, fingernail scrappings or finger swab in order to get DNA profile as direct evidence of sexual attack is often not present and might result in an offender going scot free
  • Uniform Civil Code rules cleared by state cabinet, likely to be implemented in the next 10 days
  • Supreme Court reiterates that there is no point in arresting the accused after the chargesheet has been filed and the investigation is complete
  • Kolkata court sentences Sanjoy Roy, the sole accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case, to life term. West Bengal government and CBI to appeal in HC for the death penalty
  • Supreme Court stays criminal defamation case against Rahul Gandhi for his remarks against home minister Amit Shah in Jharkhand during the AICC plenary session
  • Government reviews import basket to align it with the policies of the Trump administration
  • NCLT orders liquidation of GoAir airlines
  • Archery - Indian archers bagged 2 silver in Nimes Archery tournament in France
  • Stocks make impressive gain on Monday - Sensex adds 454 points to 77073 and Nifty 141 points to 23344
  • D Gukesh draws with Fabiano Caruana in the Tata Steel chess tournament in the Netherlands
  • Women's U-19 T20 WC - In a stunning game, debutants Nigeria beat New Zealand by 2 runs
  • Rohit Sharma to play under Ajinkye Rahane in Mumbai's Ranji match against J&K
  • Virat Kohli to play in Delhi's last group Ranji trophy match against Saurashtra. This will be his first Ranji match in 12 years
  • The toll in the Rajouri mystery illness case rose to 17 even as the Centre sent a team to study the situation
Calling the case not 'rarest of rare', a court in Kolkata sentenced Sanjay Roy, the only accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case to life in prison until death
oppn parties
Assessee Not Responsible For Ensuring TDS Is Paid To The Government: Delhi HC

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2024-10-29 11:37:36

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

Wrong Approach

The approach taken by tax authorities to recover Income Tax dues has become deeply troubling, especially when they ignore established laws and regulations by pursuing dues from the wrong parties. When tax is deducted at source from an employee's salary, the responsibility for paying that tax to the government rests solely with the employer. As per Section 205 of the Income Tax Act, once tax has been deducted from an individual's salary (or any other mandatory source), the taxpayer cannot be asked to pay the tax again unless there is a shortfall in the overall tax assessed on their total income.

Delhi HC To The Rescue

In a recent case, the Delhi High Court rightly ruled that a demand notice issued by the Income Tax department to a former pilot of the defunct Kingfisher Airlines had no legal foundation and should be rescinded. Since Kingfisher Airlines deducted the tax from the pilot's salary, it was the company's duty - not the pilot's - to remit it to the government. If the company failed to do so, the tax authorities should address the company directly to recover the dues, as the tax obligation on the pilot was already discharged at the time of deduction.

Bar Under Sec 205 Of I-T Act 

The Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) mechanism was established to ensure tax is collected from income at the point it becomes due. This system serves two primary purposes: to compel the reporting of income and to guarantee that tax is recovered at source. Under the law, it is the duty of the income provider to deduct TDS and deposit it with the government, using the payee's PAN. Once TDS has been deducted, the taxpayer has no further responsibility for remitting that tax to the government. Sec 205 of the I-T Act bars the I-T authorities from calling upon the assessee to pay the tax himself to the extent to which tax has been deducted from that income. In fact, if there is any refund that has to be claimed, the taxpayer becomes an aggrieved party because if the company does not remit the tax to the I-T department, they will not process the refund.

Stop Harassing The Taxpayers

By issuing notices demanding tax from individuals who have already had it deducted from their income, the Income Tax department is effectively asking them to pay twice on the same income - a violation of legal principles. The department should instead focus on holding accountable those companies that deduct TDS but fail to deposit it. Such misdirected recovery efforts constitute undue harassment of taxpayers and must come to an end.