oppn parties Assessee Not Responsible For Ensuring TDS Is Paid To The Government: Delhi HC

News Snippets

  • 2nd ODI: Rohit Sharma roars back to form with a scintillating ton as India beat England by 4 wickets in a high scoring match in Cuttack
  • Supreme Court will appoint an observer for the mayoral poll in Chandigarh
  • Government makes it compulsory for plastic carry bag makers to put a QR or barcode with their details on such bags
  • GBS outbreak in Pune leaves 73 ill with 14 on ventilator. GBS is a rare but treatable autoimmune disease
  • Madhya Pradesh government banned sale and consumption of liquor at 19 religious sites including Ujjain and Chitrakoot
  • Odisha emerges at the top in the fiscal health report of states while Haryana is at the bottom
  • JSW Steel net profit takes a massive hit of 70% in Q3
  • Tatas buy 60% stake in Pegatron, the contractor making iPhone's in India
  • Stocks return to negative zone - Sensex sheds 329 points to 76190 and Nifty loses 113 points to 23092
  • Bumrah, Jadeja and Yashasvi Jaiswal make the ICC Test team of the year even as no Indian found a place in the ODI squad
  • India take on England in the second T20 today at Chennai. They lead the 5-match series 1-0
  • Ravindra Jadeja excels in Ranji Trophy, takes 12 wickets in the match as Saurashtra beat Delhi by 10 wickets. All other Team India stars disappoint in the national tournament
  • Madhya Pradesh HC says collectors must not apply NSA "under political pressure and without application of mind"
  • Oxfam charged by CBI over violation of FCRA
  • Indian students in the US have started quitting part-time jobs (which are not legally allowed as per visa rules) over fears of deportation
Manipur Chief Minister Biren Singh resigns after meeting Home Minister Amit Shah and BJP chief J P Nadda /////// President's Rule likely in Manipur
oppn parties
Assessee Not Responsible For Ensuring TDS Is Paid To The Government: Delhi HC

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2024-10-29 11:37:36

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

Wrong Approach

The approach taken by tax authorities to recover Income Tax dues has become deeply troubling, especially when they ignore established laws and regulations by pursuing dues from the wrong parties. When tax is deducted at source from an employee's salary, the responsibility for paying that tax to the government rests solely with the employer. As per Section 205 of the Income Tax Act, once tax has been deducted from an individual's salary (or any other mandatory source), the taxpayer cannot be asked to pay the tax again unless there is a shortfall in the overall tax assessed on their total income.

Delhi HC To The Rescue

In a recent case, the Delhi High Court rightly ruled that a demand notice issued by the Income Tax department to a former pilot of the defunct Kingfisher Airlines had no legal foundation and should be rescinded. Since Kingfisher Airlines deducted the tax from the pilot's salary, it was the company's duty - not the pilot's - to remit it to the government. If the company failed to do so, the tax authorities should address the company directly to recover the dues, as the tax obligation on the pilot was already discharged at the time of deduction.

Bar Under Sec 205 Of I-T Act 

The Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) mechanism was established to ensure tax is collected from income at the point it becomes due. This system serves two primary purposes: to compel the reporting of income and to guarantee that tax is recovered at source. Under the law, it is the duty of the income provider to deduct TDS and deposit it with the government, using the payee's PAN. Once TDS has been deducted, the taxpayer has no further responsibility for remitting that tax to the government. Sec 205 of the I-T Act bars the I-T authorities from calling upon the assessee to pay the tax himself to the extent to which tax has been deducted from that income. In fact, if there is any refund that has to be claimed, the taxpayer becomes an aggrieved party because if the company does not remit the tax to the I-T department, they will not process the refund.

Stop Harassing The Taxpayers

By issuing notices demanding tax from individuals who have already had it deducted from their income, the Income Tax department is effectively asking them to pay twice on the same income - a violation of legal principles. The department should instead focus on holding accountable those companies that deduct TDS but fail to deposit it. Such misdirected recovery efforts constitute undue harassment of taxpayers and must come to an end.