oppn parties Appointment of Judges Tussle: No Easy Solution

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Appointment of Judges Tussle: No Easy Solution

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2023-01-16 07:04:05

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Taking the fight against the process of appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts to the next level, Law minister Kiren Rijiju has written to the Chief Justice of India, Justice D Y Chandrachud, to include the representatives of the Central government in the Supreme Court collegium and the representatives of the concerned state governments in the respective High Court collegiums. It is highly unlikely that the Supreme Court will agree to this request and the dispute is likely to escalate in the coming weeks.

The process of appointing judges to the higher judiciary is under fire from the government side for long. After the Supreme Court held that the National Judicial Appointments Act (NJAC) was unconstitutional and the collegium system would continue and later ordered the Centre to follow strict timelines in clearing names forwarded by the collegium, the Centre has raised the issue of lack of transparency and public accountability in the collegium system to hit back at the process. It has also refused to follow the timeline and has sat upon or sent back several names in the recent past.

With the judiciary not willing to cede ground and taking exception to the interference of the government in matters of appointing judges and with the government equally determined to have a say in the selection of judges, this issue is likely to lead to an acrimonious tussle between the two and there seems to be no easy solution to the problem. A major part of the blame lies with the judiciary as it has refused (except for some months) to make the deliberations of the collegium public. This lack of transparency is not good for the judiciary.

But having government representatives on the collegiums is not the ideal solution. The government must build up political consensus by taking all political parties along, discuss the matter with the judiciary and introduce another bill on the lines of the NJAC to find a lasting solution.