By Linus Garg
First publised on 2022-07-29 10:21:52
The
government has announced a financial package of Rs 1.64 lakh crore to revive
BSNL. The package is designed to de-stress its balance sheet (the public sector
telco has run up losses of Rs 30000cr in the last three years), provide it with
spectrum and also has a cash component for funding capital expenditure. But the
problem is to identify whether BSNL is competitive enough to survive in the
cut-throat business of providing telephony and internet connections to customers.
It has a miniscule percentage of customers (just over 3%) in the huge market.
Its infrastructure is outdated - when private players are jumping to 5G, the
government will provide 4G spectrum to BSNL now and 5G will be provided after
two years. With this kind of support, is the government not guilty of throwing
good money after bad in trying to revive it?
But when
one takes into consideration the fact that telecommunication is of strategic importance
and cannot be left to the private sector which is guided solely by the profit
motive, the importance of BSNL cannot be discounted. Having said that, it still
does not make sense for the government to hope for its revival as it has
imposed several restrictions (like salary constraints which do not allow it to
attract talent) and asked it to make do with outdated technology. As the
government needs the BSNL to carry out projects of strategic importance like
the BharatNet (to connect all panchayats through broadband connectivity) and
taking telephony and internet to areas where private players do not, is it not
time to convert it into a special purpose vehicle just to carry out such
projects and relieve it of the burden of competing with private players when it
is clearly not in a position to do so?
It is time
the government defines the role it would like BSNL to play, provide it with
full support and allow it to work with complete focus in those areas only.