oppn parties Burqa-Clad Voters: No Voting Without Identification

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Burqa-Clad Voters: No Voting Without Identification

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2017-03-06 22:52:20

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
The BJP has demanded that women police officers be deployed in UP to identify burqa-clad women before they are allowed to cast their votes. Since the demand has come from the BJP, it will obviously be viewed as anti-Muslim, more so because the demand is made only for burqa-clad women whereas many Hindu women also turn up at polling booths with their face covered, as per custom in several parts of India. But this is one area of voting that needs to be seriously addressed.

The BJP demand for women police officers to identify voters also shows a complete lack of knowledge of election rules. The police or other Central forces are deployed at polling booths only for security and to prevent disturbances. They have no authority to identify voters. The whole election process is completely in the hands of the Election Commission. Since few officers in the booths are women, the rules mandate that in case of doubt, any local woman can be asked to identify the voter as per her Voter ID. There is no provision to compulsorily check all veiled women.

Logically, there should be no resistance to establishing identity by lifting the veil in front of a woman. It can be done in front of a male polling officer too, if one goes by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of having Voter ID card pictures taken in burqas. Denying Muslim women the privilege of being photographed in burqas with face covered, the Supreme Court had categorically said then that “if you have such strong religious sentiments, and do not want to be seen by members of public, then do not go to vote. You cannot go with burqa to vote. It will create complications in identification of voters.”

So if Muslim or other women who wear veils for religious or social reasons can have their photos taken for the Voter ID card by male photographers and then have them handled by male officers for preparation of photo electoral rolls and Voter Identification Slips, they should have no qualms about lifting the veil at polling stations to identify themselves. It goes without saying that an unidentified voter cannot be allowed to cast her vote. The Voter ID card is an important identity document needed by all Indian citizens. One cannot get a Voter ID card made and then go to the booth in a burqa and deny to be identified. The lead picture with this story shows women in burqas flashing their Voter ID cards in which their faces can be clearly seen. So if they can flash their photos in public, why resist identifying themselves privately in front of a single polling official, male or female?

Further, religious rules, if applied, must be applied to all and uniformly. Muslim women standing for elections have posters printed with their face prominently exposed. Why not have their pictures on the posters in a burqa too. Then the process of having unidentified lawmakers elected by unidentified voters will be well and truly complete. Really, this whole thing about this religion prevents that or that religion prevents this is against the spirit of rule of law. The Supreme Court has said in many of its judgments that whenever religious practices come in conflict with the law of the land, the latter will always prevail. So it should be in case of burqa-clad or otherwise veiled women voters. They should identify themselves if challenged and religion or custom should not be an excuse to decline. If they decline to establish their identity, they should not be allowed to vote.