oppn parties CJI N V Ramana Warns Electronic Media Against Running Kangaroo Courts

News Snippets

  • For the first time ever, Mukesh Ambani buys a 29% stake in Gautam Adani's Mahan Energen, a subsidiary of Adani Power to source 500MW of electricity from the company's power plant in MP
  • Stocks continue to rise on Thursday - Sensex gains 639 points to 73635 and Nifty 203 points to 22326
  • Golf - Indian Open: 3 Indians at tied 14th as Joost Luiten takes the lead with a wonderful 7-under 65
  • IPL: RR beat DC by 12 runs as Riyan Parag (84 off just 45 balls) shines
  • SP drops two candidates owing allegiance to Azam Khan from Rampur and Moradabad
  • In Assam, a controversy erupted after a picture of UPPL leader Benjamin Basumatary, lying on a stack of Rs 500 notes circulated on social media. UPPL is an ally of the BJP
  • AAP's Jalandhar-West MP Sushil Kumar Rinku joins the BJP. He was the only AAP Lok Sabha MP
  • Supreme Court dismisses Centre's plea to review its 2023 verdict in the PMLA case
  • Close save for passengers as they remain unhurt after the wings of two planes graze at Kolkata airport. Pilots derostered and inquiry ordered by DGCA
  • Bengal BJP leader Dilip Ghosh gets notice from the EC as well as the BJP for making ugly remarks about Mamata Banerjee's parentage
  • Sadanand Vasanth Date, who faught terrorists in the 26/11 attack and was awarded the Preisent's Police medal, has been appointed the head of the NIA
  • Centre will borrow Rs 7.5L cr in the first six months of FY25, nearly 50% of the target for the full year
  • 25 stocks, including SBI, will see same day trade settlements from today in the world's fastest settlement mode in both BSE and NSE
  • Stocks recover smartly on Wednesday: Sensex rises 526 points to 72996 and Nifty 118 points to 22123
  • Tennis: Rohan Bopanna-Matthew Ebden reached the semifinals of the Miami Open
Delhi Lt Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena says government cannot be run from jail, hints at President's Rule in the capital ////// In a dangerous incident, the wings of two planes grazed while taxiing on the runway at Kolkata airport, all passengers were safe but DGCA ordered an inquiry and the pilots were derostered
oppn parties
CJI N V Ramana Warns Electronic Media Against Running Kangaroo Courts

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-07-24 11:50:11

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

CJI N V Ramana tore into the electronic and social media for "overstepping and breaching" their responsibility and asked them to self-regulate and not test "the patience of the judges" in "inviting external regulations of their activities."

Justice Ramana was concerned that a section of the electronic media was running "kangaroo courts" and discussing issues which "even experienced judges find difficult to decide." He called these debates "ill-informed and agenda-driven" and said that such debates "on issues involving justice delivery are proving to be detrimental to the health of democracy. Biased views being propagated by the media are affecting the people, weakening democracy and harming the system."

There is no doubt that the judgments delivered by Supreme Court judges are open to analysis by experts. There is also no doubt that the experts can differ from the interpretation of the judges. But the difference between these expert analysis and the so-called debates on electronic media is that while the former is backed by points of law, the latter is not and worse, it seeks to impute motives to judges.

Any judge who delivers an order does so by applying the law on the basis on facts, evidence and arguments presented before the bench. The judgment is purely according to his or her reading of the law and its applicability in the case at hand. That is why some judges on a large bench issue dissenting judgments. But that does not mean that a judge is right or wrong on the same matter but just that his or her reading of the law is different. Of course, as in most other things, in the judiciary too, the rule of the majority prevails.

It is wrong on part of the electronic media to call 'experts' with questionable credentials to 'debate' on important judgments. The way these debates are conducted, it seems that a section of the media is bent on projecting some judges as biased. Yes some judges are guilty of making unwarranted oral observations in some cases and the Supreme Court must also tackle this issue but their judgments are always as per law. If someone is aggrieved with any judgment, he or she can seek further legal remedy but rubbishing a judgment or imputing motives to a judge, without backing it up with facts, is not the right way. The electronic media should heed CJI Ramana's warning, exercise restraint and self-regulate, failing which the judges might intervene and issue orders imposing restrictions. Why should media as a whole suffer for the wrongdoings of some agenda-driven channels?