oppn parties Come On, It Was Just A Pain-Relief Cream

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Come On, It Was Just A Pain-Relief Cream

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2023-02-10 09:58:41

One of the most non-controversial players in the Indian team, Ravindra Jadeja, was the centre of a cooked up, but short-lived, controversy on Day 1 of the first Test between India and Australia. It so happened that Jadeja applied a cream on his index (and hence the spinning) finger during play. Immediately, there were conjectures about what he was applying and whether it was legal.

Former England captain Michael Vaughan wondered what Jadeja was applying and said that he had never seen this in a tweet. Former Australian captain Tim Paine found the matter 'interesting'. Fox Cricket even claimed that it was a 'questionable moment' and unnecessarily tried to cook up a debate. It was later disclosed that the cream was allowed to be applied under ICCs playing conditions and bowlers often apply it to manage calluses on their fingers or relieve pain.

Whenever India plays Australia, India baiting rears its head. It takes many forms and sometimes non-events are also made controversial. Yesterday's buzz around Jadeja was also one such instance. Those who were commenting must recognize that the field umpires, the third umpire, the opposition players and the opposition dugout, along with more than a dozen TV cameras, all keep a hawk's eye on the proceedings especially after the Australians tampered with the ball in South Africa in 2018 and David Warner, Steve Smith and Cameron Bancroft were banned - the first two for one year and Bancroft for 9 months.

Hence, it is now almost impossible for players to indulge in anything illegal, including tampering with the ball, on the field. Thus, it would be best if such incidents are not given a colour. Those who speak on any incident must first find out the truth. Let the players focus on the game and not embroil them in needless controversy. 

PS: Ravindra Jadeja was later fined 25% of his match fees for not seeking the umpires' permission before applying the cream. Match referee Andy Pycroft deemed it to be a violation of Article 2.20 of the ICC code of conduct. He laos handed one demerit point to Jadeja, his first in a 24-month period.