oppn parties Courts Order Lockdowns: Judicial Activism?

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Courts Order Lockdowns: Judicial Activism?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-04-19 15:27:07

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The judiciary today came down heavily on two state governments for their handling of the Covid situation. While the Allahabad High Court went all the way and asked the UP government to lock down 5 cities in the state for 6 days beginning tonight, the Telangana High Court gave a 48-hour ultimatum to the state government to decide on curfews or lockdown before it took a decision.

The Allahabad High Court said that the UP government's handling of the Covid situation left a lot to be desired and in view of the surging cases in the state, it directed the government to impose lockdown (while permitting essential services to function normally, but ordering that all hawkers go off the streets after 11 am) in five cities - Lucknow, Prayagraj, Varanasi, Kanpur and Gorakhpur - from 10 pm tonight till 6 am on Monday, April 26. Stating that it had to save lives and livelihood, the state government has, as of now, decided not to impose the lockdown. It has said that it will take a considered decision in the matter as early as possible.

The Telengana High Court, on the other hand, asked the state government to take a decision regarding imposing curfew or lockdown and other restrictions in the state in view of the alarming surge in coronavirus cases. It has warned the government that if it does not get an 'action taken' report within 48 hours, it will be constrained to issue orders.

While the executive will consider this as the judiciary trespassing in its domain, the crux of the matter is that with the virus spreading at an alarming speed, governments in all states are guilty of laxity and prevarication. Their response to the second wave, as also of the Centre, has been arbitrary and extremely slow. State governments have only recently started enforcing the Covid health protocols (liking fining people for not wearing masks) when it was known from March-end that the public needed to be disciplined. There is no doubt that we need to protect livelihood of people and lockdown are huge disrupters of economic activity, but the point is that if administrations all over India had imposed basic restriction and were strict from March, perhaps the need for lockdowns would not have arisen.

If courts are ordering lockdowns now, it is only because they see lakhs of infected persons and piling dead bodies. They also see that things are getting out of hand and neither the Centre nor the state governments have disclosed a strong and coordinated programme to control the situation. Can one fault them for this?