oppn parties Courts Order Lockdowns: Judicial Activism?

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Courts Order Lockdowns: Judicial Activism?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-04-19 15:27:07

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The judiciary today came down heavily on two state governments for their handling of the Covid situation. While the Allahabad High Court went all the way and asked the UP government to lock down 5 cities in the state for 6 days beginning tonight, the Telangana High Court gave a 48-hour ultimatum to the state government to decide on curfews or lockdown before it took a decision.

The Allahabad High Court said that the UP government's handling of the Covid situation left a lot to be desired and in view of the surging cases in the state, it directed the government to impose lockdown (while permitting essential services to function normally, but ordering that all hawkers go off the streets after 11 am) in five cities - Lucknow, Prayagraj, Varanasi, Kanpur and Gorakhpur - from 10 pm tonight till 6 am on Monday, April 26. Stating that it had to save lives and livelihood, the state government has, as of now, decided not to impose the lockdown. It has said that it will take a considered decision in the matter as early as possible.

The Telengana High Court, on the other hand, asked the state government to take a decision regarding imposing curfew or lockdown and other restrictions in the state in view of the alarming surge in coronavirus cases. It has warned the government that if it does not get an 'action taken' report within 48 hours, it will be constrained to issue orders.

While the executive will consider this as the judiciary trespassing in its domain, the crux of the matter is that with the virus spreading at an alarming speed, governments in all states are guilty of laxity and prevarication. Their response to the second wave, as also of the Centre, has been arbitrary and extremely slow. State governments have only recently started enforcing the Covid health protocols (liking fining people for not wearing masks) when it was known from March-end that the public needed to be disciplined. There is no doubt that we need to protect livelihood of people and lockdown are huge disrupters of economic activity, but the point is that if administrations all over India had imposed basic restriction and were strict from March, perhaps the need for lockdowns would not have arisen.

If courts are ordering lockdowns now, it is only because they see lakhs of infected persons and piling dead bodies. They also see that things are getting out of hand and neither the Centre nor the state governments have disclosed a strong and coordinated programme to control the situation. Can one fault them for this?