By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-10-27 06:33:06
Two
convicts in an acid attack case, who were sentenced to life imprisonment by the
trial court, appealed against the sentence in the Delhi High Court on the
grounds that it was not conclusively proved that the substance they threw on
the victim was acid. But the Delhi HC did not allow them to wriggle out of
their sentence on the specious and illegal ground. Relying on the clear
explanation given in Section 326B, read with Section 326A, of the Indian Penal
Code (IPC), the Delhi HC upheld the conviction and additionally imposed a fine
of Rs 5 lakh on the convicts which was to be paid as compensation to the
victim.
The court
said that the explanation to Section 326B clearly mentions that the substance
in question can be acid or any other substance that is acidic or corrosive or
burning in nature capable of scarring or disfigurement or temporary or permanent
disability, even if the injury is reversible. Hence, the argument that what
they threw was not conclusively proved to be acid does not hold. Since the
victim was scarred and disfigured by what they threw at her, the crime under
section 326A was committed by the convicts and they needed to be punished as
per law.
The Delhi
HC has correctly interpreted the provisions of the two sections. The idea of
the legislature was to punish people for scarring, disfiguring or causing
temporary or permanent disability to victims of such attacks. The exact
nomenclature of the substance used was not meant to be, and cannot be,
restricted to just the word 'acid' and that is why the explanation is given in
Section 326B. This decision by the Delhi HC will send a strong signal and
perhaps deter others from committing such ghastly crimes.