oppn parties Delhi HC: "Any Corrossive Substance Is Acid"

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Delhi HC: "Any Corrossive Substance Is Acid"

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-10-27 06:33:06

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Two convicts in an acid attack case, who were sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court, appealed against the sentence in the Delhi High Court on the grounds that it was not conclusively proved that the substance they threw on the victim was acid. But the Delhi HC did not allow them to wriggle out of their sentence on the specious and illegal ground. Relying on the clear explanation given in Section 326B, read with Section 326A, of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Delhi HC upheld the conviction and additionally imposed a fine of Rs 5 lakh on the convicts which was to be paid as compensation to the victim.

The court said that the explanation to Section 326B clearly mentions that the substance in question can be acid or any other substance that is acidic or corrosive or burning in nature capable of scarring or disfigurement or temporary or permanent disability, even if the injury is reversible. Hence, the argument that what they threw was not conclusively proved to be acid does not hold. Since the victim was scarred and disfigured by what they threw at her, the crime under section 326A was committed by the convicts and they needed to be punished as per law.

The Delhi HC has correctly interpreted the provisions of the two sections. The idea of the legislature was to punish people for scarring, disfiguring or causing temporary or permanent disability to victims of such attacks. The exact nomenclature of the substance used was not meant to be, and cannot be, restricted to just the word 'acid' and that is why the explanation is given in Section 326B. This decision by the Delhi HC will send a strong signal and perhaps deter others from committing such ghastly crimes.