oppn parties Denied Anticipatory Bail By The Supreme Court, Chidambaram Faces Arrest

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court dismisses industry bodies' plea to stop the SBI from disclosing the numbers of the electoral bonds
  • NDA finalizes seat sharing in Bihar - BJP 17, JD(U) 16 aqnd LJP 5
  • Election Commission removes Home secretaries of Gujarat, UP, Bihar, HP, Uttarakhand and Jharkhand and the DGP of Bengal
  • Telangana governor Tamilsai Soundararajan resigned from his post and is likely to contest for the BJP from Chennai
  • ED claims K Kavitha of the BRS paid Kejriwal and Sisodia Rs 100cr in the alleged liquor scam in Delhi. AAP says this is a ploy to malign their names
  • Supreme Court tells SBI not to be selective and disclose full details of electoral bonds
  • With the US Department of Justice rpobing bribery charges against Adani group companies, Adani group shares and bonds are under pressure
  • Narayan Murthy gifts Infosys shares worth Rs 240cr to his 4-month-old grandson
  • Tata Sons to sell Rs 9362cr worth shares of TCS to pare debt
  • Stocks were positive on Monday - Sesex climbed 104 points to 72748 and Nifty 32 points to 22055
  • IOA dissolves the ad-hoc panel and gives full control of WFI to elected panel headed by Brij Bhushan aide Sanjay Singh
  • Controversy erupts after BJP leader Tathagata Roy prescribes the cicumcision test for those seeking citizenship under CAA. TMC calls it a 'vulgar jibe'
  • Rahul Gandhi concludes his Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra in Mumbai, holds a mega rally at Shivaji Park and says the BJP does not have the courage to change the Constitution despite making a lot of noise in that regard
  • ED issues two fresh summons to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal in the liqour excise case just a day after he got bail in the earlier cases of ignoring the summons
  • A 14-year-old girl killed herself after she was strip-searched at school in Bagalkot in Karnataka
Election Commission orders removal of home secretaries of 6 states and the DGP of Bengal
oppn parties
Denied Anticipatory Bail By The Supreme Court, Chidambaram Faces Arrest

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The Supreme Court today rejected the anticipatory bail plea of P Chidambaram in the INX Media case. The court was of the opinion that "anticipatory bail has to be exercised sparingly in cases of economic offences. Considering the facts and circumstances, this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail." It also said that the investigating agency had to be given sufficient freedom to conduct the probe and granting anticipatory bail to the accused at this stage is likely to "frustrate" the investigation. The court asked him to move the trial court for regular bail. With this, Chidambaram now faces arrest by the ED in this case.

Given the influence Chidambaram still wields in power circles (being an ex-finance minister, he is likely to have sympathizers in most government departments) the court has rightly denied him protection from arrest. The court is also right in saying that economic offences must be treated differently and given the magnitude of the allegations and the office occupied by Chidambaram when they are alleged to have been committed, it is all the more necessary to prevent him from meddling with or trying to influence the ongoing investigation against him.

Although Chidambaram himself and the Congress party are crying hoarse that the case against him is nothing but political vendetta and an attempt to tarnish his image, prima facie he stands guilty of trying to create hurdles in the investigation process by avoiding the CBI when a notice was posted on the gate of his house as he was not at home. His son Karti says that the government is indulging in a drama for television audiences. But who afforded the opportunity? If there was a guard at the gate of the house and if he had opened the gates when the CBI team came to arrest him, there would not have been any need for officers to climb the boundary wall and create a spectacle. It did not belittle the agency; it only reinforced the view in public mind that Chidambaram was doing everything to avoid arrest.

As for political vendetta, this is just the beginning of the case. If Chidambaram, being a top lawyer himself, had appeared before the CBI and explained his position, maybe he would have been in a better position to accuse the government of highhandedness. But by being evasive, he has done the opposite. Further, if the law is the same for everyone, why is Chidambaram looking for special treatment? Instead of wasting time in trying to avoid arrest, Chidambaram should assiduously prepare his defence if he has done nothing wrong, as he claims. But if his decisions were influenced by bribery and if the CBI and the ED can prove it in court, hard days lie ahead for the man who had once presented what was called the "dream budget".