oppn parties Discrimination Against The LGBTQIA Community: A Judge Learns To Junk Misconceptions

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Discrimination Against The LGBTQIA Community: A Judge Learns To Junk Misconceptions

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-06-11 04:45:51

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Justice N Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court has set a tough example for his peers. To decide a case, he came out of his comfort zone and learned about the subject at hand from experts and the people who were the subject matter of the case - the LGBTQIA community. In the process he found out the prejudices and the misconceptions that are harboured, mainly due to ignorance, to perpetuate the discrimination against the community. At the end of it all, he was compelled to say that "ignorance is no justification for normalizing any form of discrimination."

The case before the bench was about a lesbian couple who had fled from Madurai to Chennai to escape persecution and applied for protection from police action after the women's parents filed a complaint as they were ashamed of the sexual identities of their daughters. The court asked the police to close the case and issued a directive that they should close all such complaints against LGBTQIA couples in consensual adult relationship.

The bench went on to issue guidelines for action to be taken is such cases. It barred the use of bogus therapy to try and change the sexual orientation of people. It directed the state to provide shelter to transpersons at anganwadis and short-stay homes and organize awareness programmes for all sections of society, including parents, judges, law enforcers, prison officials and teachers. It asked for changes in school and college curricula, gender-neutral washrooms and training health workers to accept gender non-conforming children without mockery. In doing so, the court laid out an ambitious blueprint for inclusion. The court said that it expected the authorities to implement these guidelines "not for the sake of complying with a judicial fiat but to ensure that this society evolves, and the LGBTQIA+ community is not pushed out of the mainstream."

There is no doubt that the LGBTQIA community is heavily discriminated against in Indian society even after Section 377, the colonial-era law that criminalized homosexuality,  was read down by the Supreme Court in 2018. The abuse and discrimination takes many forms. The bench has done well to highlight the issue and it is hoped that the guidelines will change the way the judiciary and law enforcers handle cases involving the community. But for a wider change and acceptance, society will have to shed its prejudices and recognize that neither is a different sexual orientation a 'curse' nor is it a 'disease' that can be cured. It is as normal as being heterosexual and should be accepted and respected.