oppn parties Does Rahul Gandhi Deserve Sympathy For Calling All Modis Chor?

News Snippets

  • Coal exploration plan worth Rs 2980cr cleared by Union cabinet
  • Government ploughs in Rs 89000cr in BSNL for 4G, 5G spectrum operations
  • Stocks gain on Wednesday: Sensex adds 350 points to 63142 and Nifty 127 points to 18726
  • Wresters agitation: Sports minister assures action by June 15, wrestlers put off agitation till then
  • WTC Final: India lose the plot after putting Australia to bat as Steve Smith stands like a rock and Travis Head counter attacks to put Australia (327 for 3) in command on the first day
  • Wrestlers agitation: Bajrang Punia. Sakshi Mallik and Vinesh Phogat rejoin work in Railways, BKU pulls back but wrestlers say agitation will go on
  • UP bahubali-turned-politician gets life in 32-year-old murder case
  • India-US seal defence cooperation roadmap as Defence minister Rajnath Singh meets US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin
  • CBI probe in the train mishap will look at error in interlocking system and probe the sabotage angle
  • Violence continues in Manipur as three persons were killed after a mob attacked an ambulance in Imphal West district
  • Karnataka cabinet is likely to discuss cow slaugther law in its next meeting
  • Rahul Gandhi woos diaspora in the US, tries to show the fight in India as between those who believe in Mahatma Gandhi and those in Nathuram Godse
  • In preparation of a shutdown, MTNL moving operations to BSNL
  • Services sector sustains growth although Services PMI slips from 62 in April to 61.2 in May
  • Stocks gain handsomely on Monday: Sensex rises 240 points to 62787 and Nifty 59 points to 18593
WTC Final: Australia take firm grip on Day1 - Travis Head (146 batting) and Steve Smith (95 batting) take them to 327 for 3 as Indian bowling falters
oppn parties
Does Rahul Gandhi Deserve Sympathy For Calling All Modis Chor?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2023-03-23 15:28:40

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The outrage of the Congress at the sentencing of Rahul Gandhi in the so-called 'Modi surname' case is misplaced. Rahul Gandhi made a gross statement - he cannot claim immunity just because it was made during an election campaign. Not only did he allude that all thieves have Modi as their surname, he went on to add that let us see how many more thieves emerge with the surname Modi after Narendra Modi, Neerav Modi and Lalit Modi. It was insulting and defamed all those whose surname is Modi - and there are lakhs of Modis from Gujarat and Rajasthan who are spread all over the world. The worst part is that even though the defamation case was filed against him over the issue in 2019, in these four years Rahul Gandhi did not think fit to issue an unconditional apology to all the Modis he had insulted. There is no vendetta here nor is the BJP involved (except for the fact that the suit was filed by a BJP MLA whose surname is also Modi). Hence, the opposition will do well not to make it a political issue or claim that Rahul Gandhi is being victimized. He made a mistake and the law must take its own course. He has many legal options before him and will naturally explore them to the full.  

But let us be clear about this - this is not a case of freedom of speech, it is a case of abominable behaviour where a person who aspires to be the prime minister of the nation abused an entire community of people whose surname is Modi. Rahul Gandhi cannot claim political immunity for this. If he had used the remarks in the context of Narendra Modi, Neerav Modi or Lalit Modi, he could have claimed political immunity as it was part of an election speech. But when he increased the scope of the remarks to include lakhs of faceless people whose surname is Modi and who might not have even stolen a few winks, let alone something valuable, he made a grievous mistake. The Surat court was right in saying that Rahul Gandhi had been warned by the Supreme Court (after he apologized in the contempt of court case for saying that the Supreme Court had confirmed Modi was chor when in fact the court had just given its verdict on the admissibility of some documents) to be careful with his statements but his conduct had not changed. It was also right in saying that senior political leaders and MPs are expected to set examples and since Rahul has not changed his ways, "lesser punishment will send the wrong message to the public and the purpose of defamation will not be achieved".