oppn parties Draft National Encryption Policy: Ill-advised and Stupid

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Draft National Encryption Policy: Ill-advised and Stupid

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2015-09-26 13:40:21

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
It must be a first when a confused government issues a draft policy and takes it back within 48 hours. The National Encryption Policy was an ill-advised document, perhaps drafted by technologically deficient bureaucrats. It was designed to intrude upon the privacy of common people in a dictatorial manner. It is almost impossible for people to store all messages and mails on their digital devices for ninety days. There are several reasons for this, but suffice it to say that it is the personal wish of the person on what messages he wants to store and what to delete.

The Modi government has been very pro-active in trying to curb privacy. In fact, despite previous governments having put draft Right to Privacy Bills in public domain, the Attorney General has asked the Supreme Court to define the contours of such a right. Hence, it is not surprising that the government came up with such a policy.

But as citizens have become increasingly aware of what constitutes an intrusion upon their privacy, the government will not be able to force such stupid legislations down their throat. Apart from civil groups that are ever vigilant in this regard, common citizen also take to social media in large numbers and denounce any such moves by the government.

Telecom minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, while withdrawing the draft policy, said that some "expressions" in the policy had raised misgivings. Sorry Sir, it is not the expressions but the attitude of the government that has caused misgivings. Why is the government bent on playing big brother? Why does it want to anyhow get a peek into what its ordinary citizens are doing?

If the government is concerned about national security and wishes to curb the ease of communication digital devices offer to terrorists, it will have to rack its brain on how to do this. Such a blanket restrictive policy will not work. One thing is sure - it will have to take expert advice. Its bureaucrats are not knowledgeable enough and will always come up with policies that will leave egg on the government's face.