oppn parties EAM S Jaishankar Was Right In Cancelling The Meeting With The US HFAC

News Snippets

  • Coal exploration plan worth Rs 2980cr cleared by Union cabinet
  • Government ploughs in Rs 89000cr in BSNL for 4G, 5G spectrum operations
  • Stocks gain on Wednesday: Sensex adds 350 points to 63142 and Nifty 127 points to 18726
  • Wresters agitation: Sports minister assures action by June 15, wrestlers put off agitation till then
  • WTC Final: India lose the plot after putting Australia to bat as Steve Smith stands like a rock and Travis Head counter attacks to put Australia (327 for 3) in command on the first day
  • Wrestlers agitation: Bajrang Punia. Sakshi Mallik and Vinesh Phogat rejoin work in Railways, BKU pulls back but wrestlers say agitation will go on
  • UP bahubali-turned-politician gets life in 32-year-old murder case
  • India-US seal defence cooperation roadmap as Defence minister Rajnath Singh meets US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin
  • CBI probe in the train mishap will look at error in interlocking system and probe the sabotage angle
  • Violence continues in Manipur as three persons were killed after a mob attacked an ambulance in Imphal West district
  • Karnataka cabinet is likely to discuss cow slaugther law in its next meeting
  • Rahul Gandhi woos diaspora in the US, tries to show the fight in India as between those who believe in Mahatma Gandhi and those in Nathuram Godse
  • In preparation of a shutdown, MTNL moving operations to BSNL
  • Services sector sustains growth although Services PMI slips from 62 in April to 61.2 in May
  • Stocks gain handsomely on Monday: Sensex rises 240 points to 62787 and Nifty 59 points to 18593
WTC Final: Australia take firm grip on Day1 - Travis Head (146 batting) and Steve Smith (95 batting) take them to 327 for 3 as Indian bowling falters
oppn parties
EAM S Jaishankar Was Right In Cancelling The Meeting With The US HFAC

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2019-12-21 13:22:08

A section of the media is raising a needless controversy over a cancelled meeting in Washington DC. India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar was to meet the powerful House Foreign Affairs Committee (HFAC) in the US capital. But when he came to know that Democrat Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal was also invited, he cancelled the meeting. The move was criticized widely in the US, including by Democratic Presidential hopefuls Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Later, ministry officials said since Jayapal was not a member of the HFAC, the minister was under no obligation to meet her.

Jayapal is famous for having introduced a resolution in the US House of Representatives that called for India to remove all restrictions on communications in Jammu & Kashmir. Her views on India are well known. In that sense, she is what is called an "India baiter" in the US. Since she was not a member of the HFAC, the minister rightly refused to meet her. The HFAC had neither informed beforehand nor taken permission from the Indian side to invite 'outsiders', in whatever capacity, during the meeting between Jaishankar and the Committee. The minister was right in cancelling the meeting in the face of the changed situation.

The US lawmakers and the Democratic Presidential hopefuls might argue that this was unwarranted but they are seeing just one side of the picture. Why should the foreign minister of a sovereign nation be forced to meet someone who he knows has a vicious agenda against his country and more so when that person is not even a member of the original committee with whom the meeting was fixed? It is standard practice in diplomatic circles to obtain a list of those who will attend meetings in advance so that the dignitary can prepare himself for any eventuality. Jayapal's name was not on the list as she is not a member of the HFAC and she was added later. How could Jaishankar have agreed, then, to let Jayapal hijack the meet with her barbs at India's J&K policy?