oppn parties Farm Talks Inconclusive As Farmers Want Laws To Go

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Farm Talks Inconclusive As Farmers Want Laws To Go

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-12-02 02:57:10

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The standoff between the Centre and the farmers continued as the talks between the two on Tuesday remained inconclusive. The farmers want a repeal of the new agriculture laws and are not budging from their stand. The government, on its part, gave them a patient hearing but did not commit anything. It wanted the farmers to constitute a smaller group but they insisted that the government talk with everyone. It also wanted to constitute a panel to discuss the laws and find a solution but the farmers rejected that suggestion. It maybe the farmers are adopting a hard stance to get more concessions but if the talks get prolonged, there would be problems.

Obviously, repealing the laws is out of question. Changing the status quo is not easy. The farmers are used to the MSP and mandi sale system. There are many intermediaries who benefit by it. The state government rakes in a huge amount of tax on mandi sales. These are interested elements that will resist change.

But the farmers will achieve little by being adamant. The Centre must impress upon them that the state laws enacted by Punjab and other Congress-rules states are just posturing. Agriculture is a subject on which both the Centre and the states can bring in laws but in a conflict, the Central law will always prevail. Then, it must somehow ensure that the MSP system will remain for as long as needed.

It must also convince the farmers the benefits of moving to the new system. The farmers are worried that the corporate sector will run all over them in the new system. The government must show them how the intermediaries are doing more than that now. It must also explain to them the checks and balances the new laws have to prevent a complete takeover of agriculture by the corporate sector.

In short, the government must convince the farmers that their fears are unfounded. The farmers must also understand that the new laws are here to stay. They will have to prepare for a life under the new laws. They must seek all clarifications from the government. If need be, they can ask the government to notify the same by issuing rules and guidelines under the new laws. But seeking a repeal of the new laws will prolong the issue and hamper the growth of the sector.